"The Battle of Preston (17–19 August 1648)" Topic
2 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Age of Sail Message Board Back to the Renaissance Battle Reports Message Board
Action Log
27 Feb 2018 12:46 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Changed title from "The Battle of Preston (17–19 August 1648" to "The Battle of Preston (17–19 August 1648)"
- Removed from Blogs of War board
- Removed from Renaissance Gallery board
- Crossposted to Renaissance Battle Reports board
Areas of InterestRenaissance 18th Century Napoleonic 19th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleCommand figures for the 1410 Teutonics.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile ArticleThe Editor heads for Vicksburg...
Featured Book Review
|
Tango01 | 27 Feb 2018 12:42 p.m. PST |
"On 8 July 1648, when the Scottish Engager army crossed the Border in support of the English Royalist,[4] the military situation was well defined. For the Parliamentarians, Cromwell besieged Pembroke in South Wales, Fairfax besieged Colchester in Essex, and Colonel Edward Rossiter besieged Pontefract and Scarborough in the north. On 11 July, Pembroke fell and Colchester followed on 28 August.[5] Elsewhere, however, the rebellion, which had been put down by rapidity of action rather than sheer weight of numbers, still smouldered. Charles, the Prince of Wales, with the fleet cruised along the Essex coast. Cromwell and John Lambert, however, understood each other perfectly, while the Scottish commanders quarrelled with each other and with Sir Marmaduke Langdale (the English Royalist commander in the north west).[6] As the English Royalist uprisings were close to collapse, it was on the adventures of the Engager Scottish army that the interest of the war centred. It was by no means the veteran army of the Earl of Leven, which had long been disbanded. For the most part it consisted of raw levies and, as the Kirk party had refused to sanction The Engagement (an agreement between Charles I and the Scots Parliament for the Scots to intervene in England on behalf of Charles), David Leslie and thousands of experienced officers and men declined to serve. The leadership of the Duke of Hamilton proved to be a poor substitute for that of Leslie. Hamilton's army, too, was so ill provided that as soon as England was invaded it began to plunder the countryside for the bare means of sustenance…." From Wiki Nice wargame here….
Main page link Amicalement Armand |
Tango01 | 28 Feb 2018 11:06 a.m. PST |
|
|