"Question about a Specific Rank in the US Army, 1917" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Discussion Groups and Wargaming Forums Message Board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Profile Article The final installment of our ReaperCon report.
Featured Book Review
|
| GreyONE | 20 Feb 2018 10:41 p.m. PST |
I was reading about an officer sent to France, in a machine gun unit, in the US Army in 1917. His rank is listed as a "provincial lieutenant". I cannot find information on this rank. What does it mean? He was later a Lieutenant-Colonel in WWII. |
| Cerdic | 20 Feb 2018 11:16 p.m. PST |
Maybe a misspelling of provisional? |
| GreyONE | 20 Feb 2018 11:39 p.m. PST |
That may be it. I thought it looked odd and any reference I could find pointed to the UK, not the USA. It was in a book and probably missed a spell check because it was spelled correctly but just the wrong word. Thank you Cedric. |
79thPA  | 21 Feb 2018 6:30 a.m. PST |
Perhaps a state national guard officer on federal service? The New York State National Guard had provisional units, and their officers attended a provisional officer school. |
| Ed Mohrmann | 21 Feb 2018 9:52 a.m. PST |
One of the documents we have in the antique shop is
a commission for a 'provisional' officer. The person
in question was a senior NCO assigned to a newly formed
motor transport unit and, rather than being appointed
a Warrant Officer, was provisionally commissioned as a
2nd Lieutenant. The year was 1917, early (mid-March, according to the
date). It looks as if the 'provincial' may indeed have been
a misunderstanding/misspelling. |
|
goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.