Help support TMP


"2 US DDs in Black Sea" Topic


13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Civil Disorder


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:100 M-113s

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian shows off M-113s painted by Old Guard Painters.


Current Poll


936 hits since 19 Feb 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian19 Feb 2018 10:32 p.m. PST

Under cover of darkness, U.S. Navy guided-missile destroyer USS Ross (DDG-71) slipped through the Bosporus Strait and into the Black Sea on Friday. The next day USS Carney (DDG-64) joined Ross…

link

Cacique Caribe19 Feb 2018 11:09 p.m. PST

Oh brother. Why in the world?

Dan

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian20 Feb 2018 5:42 a.m. PST

I suppose it's a "freedom of navigation" thing…

zoneofcontrol20 Feb 2018 6:59 a.m. PST

"2 US DDs in Black Sea"

When I first saw this I thought of Sherman tanks. Duh !

pzivh43 Supporting Member of TMP20 Feb 2018 10:30 a.m. PST

Yes, freedom of navigation cruise. If you don't exercise the right of free passage thru international waters, a county (like, say, Russia for the Black Sea, or China, for the South China Sea area) could have a claim that the area is internal waters. We've been doing this and similar for years. No big deal, but necessary.

Cacique Caribe20 Feb 2018 10:51 a.m. PST

Pzivh43

Got it. Good to know. Thanks.

Dan

Choctaw20 Feb 2018 11:57 a.m. PST

I hope they don't collide with anything.

Begemot20 Feb 2018 2:16 p.m. PST

Last time I looked at a map, the Black Sea is bordered by the following countries: Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania, Ukraine, Russia, and Georgia. Assuming that Russia is not the only country with ships in the Black Sea, then I don't quite see why the US Navy needs to establish the "freedom of navigation". Wouldn't the other bordering countries' own ships do that?

Tgunner20 Feb 2018 4:08 p.m. PST

The oceans and the seas are the global commons. We trade everywhere and with nearly everyone. Also Georgia and Turkey are allies and trading partners. We have the right to be there, so why not.

EnemyAce20 Feb 2018 4:28 p.m. PST

Turkey, Romania, and Bulgaria are all NATO members and make up close to 50% of the BS coastline, so it seems not only appropriate, but necessary for the US and other NATO members to train and drill there.

Striker20 Feb 2018 5:32 p.m. PST

I thought there was a special request or notice that had to be given when transiting the Bosporus?

Cacique Caribe22 Feb 2018 5:01 p.m. PST

Turkish to the left of me
Turkish to the right
Here I am, stuck in the middle with you …

Dan

picture

KniazSuvorov22 Feb 2018 5:28 p.m. PST

I don't quite see why the US Navy needs to establish the "freedom of navigation". Wouldn't the other bordering countries' own ships do that?

"Freedom of navigation" exercises conducted by the US Navy have nothing to do with NATO, or with merchant shipping, American or otherwise. They are conducted for the sole purpose of reminding everyone --allies and enemies alike-- that the USN goes where it wants to. It's essentially old-school gunboat diplomacy hiding behind a thin veneer of international law.

That said, it isn't necessarily a bad thing.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.