Help support TMP


"First Battle of 2018- Meeting Engagement in June 1862" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Cavalry

Fernando Enterprises paints Union cavalry and Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian bases them up.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Peter Pig Mortar Schooner

The G Dog Fezian replicates a mortar schooner at Fort Jackson during the New Orleans campaign.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


1,491 hits since 31 Jan 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

marshalGreg31 Jan 2018 10:25 a.m. PST

Fellow TSS ers and I played 2nd ed Brigade FnF game for the start of 2018. This would be Steve and I 2nd with the revision of the rules and the other their 1st. The changes are a welcome addition as to make the system a better ACW feel and align to many of the other very popular ACW systems.
link
This scenario takes place as a what if based on the northern actions, once Lee took the offensive in June 1862.
This was a meeting engagement. The confederates had to plan without any knowledge of the union where-abouts with any units on the field were not yet placed on the table in any fashion. This would consist of the confederates players making adjustment to the march plan forces and march to points to that set by the scenario, but once again with no knowledge of union position or force size.
The goals was for the confederates to locate and cut the Union LOC, push the union forces away from the LOC and destroy as much as the force as possible. The Union goal to frustrate this by controlling the LOC or moving the forces up the LOC without much loss.
More pictures, with descriptive captions are here: link


MG

marshalGreg31 Jan 2018 12:37 p.m. PST

I seem to lost my editing window
take II
Fellow TSS ers and I played 2nd ed Brigade FnF game for the start of 2018. This would be Steve and Is 2nd, with the revision of the rules, and the others their 1st. The changes are a welcome addition, as to make the system a much better ACW feel, and to align to many of the other very popular ACW systems.
[I tried to embed a picture here but can't figure it out from the flickr site.]
This scenario takes place as a what if based on the northern actions, once Lee took the offensive, in June 1862.
This was a meeting engagement. The confederates had to plan without any knowledge of the union where-abouts [without any units on the field…yet placed on the table in any fashion]. This would consist of the confederates players making any adjustment to the march plan forces and march to points to that set by the scenario as needed for their final plans. Once again, with any knowledge of union positions or force size.
The goals was for the confederates to locate and cut the Union LOC, push the union forces away from that LOC and then destroy as much of the force as possible. The Union goal to frustrate this by controlling the LOC or moving the forces up the LOC without much loss.
More pictures, with descriptive captions are here: link

thanks for looking!

MG

138SquadronRAF31 Jan 2018 2:35 p.m. PST

Nicely presented. Thank you.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.