Help support TMP


"Old Glory vs 1898 Miniaturas" Topic


9 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the 19th Century Product Reviews Message Board

Back to the Spanish-American War Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Volley & Bayonet


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Lemax Christmas Trees

It's probably too late already this season to snatch these bargains up...


Featured Workbench Article

1:600 Scale Masts from Bay Area Yards

Hate having to scratchbuild your own masts? Not any more...


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,878 hits since 22 Jan 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

marco56 Supporting Member of TMP22 Jan 2018 7:22 p.m. PST

How do these ranges compare to each other?
Mark

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP22 Jan 2018 9:22 p.m. PST

They don't play wel together.

PM your email and I send you some side by side shots.

Col Durnford Supporting Member of TMP23 Jan 2018 7:19 a.m. PST

I did my last post on my phone so here is more detail.

The 1898 figures are first rate and if I was just starting out they would be the only figures I would buy. However, almost all my SAW figures are Old Glory with a two Tiger Spanish units (Civil Guard).

I purchased (or should I say rented) some 1898 figures last year. I have the pictures before me. The 1898 figures are somewhat shorter and quite a bit slimmer than Old Glory. To use a fantasy comparison; the 1898 are elves, Old Glory are men, and Tiger are ogres.

Once again PM me and I will gladly sent you my side by side shots.

Vince

marco56 Supporting Member of TMP23 Jan 2018 7:33 a.m. PST

Thank you Vince.
Mark

coolyork23 Jan 2018 5:09 p.m. PST

I agree with VCarter as to the quality of the 1898 figures . However it is very incomplete range at this point and quite pricey . The Old Glory figure are very good sculpture and with a complete line . Each pack of 30 come with multiple poses and are available at a very reasonable price especially if you get the Army Deal . That being said" to each his own " !

coolyork24 Jan 2018 5:07 p.m. PST

Let me retract some of my above statement As to line not being complete, I am some what incorrect. I was thinking of the Gringo 28mm range . The 1898 range is much more complete then I had stated . They have a few minor holes to fill but otherwise fairly complete . The price is more then the Old Glory range of figs ,but they are a better sculpted figure . When one is wrong ,one should own up to it . Note I may be a bit of a homer as I own 400 or so OG figs . Either range would do you well !

marco56 Supporting Member of TMP24 Jan 2018 7:58 p.m. PST

I collect the 1898 figures.I like them as there are not any duplicates in their packs and are nicely sculpted.They have a ways to go but they just started the company a little over a year ago.I wish they did compare sizewise with OG as it would have been nice to combine the ranges.
Mark

coolyork24 Jan 2018 9:13 p.m. PST

I must admit had the two companies had these out at the same time and where complete I would have gone with 1898 figures . I may still acquire some for a diorama . Enjoy

Corporal Fagen28 Feb 2018 12:32 p.m. PST

Would Old Glory Buffalo Soldiers and 1898 Filipinos work together?

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.