Help support TMP


"Field fortifications for war of 1812?" Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the War of 1812 Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

The Great Rail Wars


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Captain Boel Umfrage

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian returns to Flintloque to paint an Ogre.


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


Featured Book Review


1,046 hits since 4 Jan 2018
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

OSL200004 Jan 2018 9:40 a.m. PST

Could someone tell me or show me a few links of standard field fortifications that were used in the war of 1812? I wanted to invest (either buy or build my own) in some of these for my 28mm war of 1812.

Thanks

Vincent Solfronk04 Jan 2018 4:42 p.m. PST

You should look at the Red Stick (Creek Indians) breastwork at Horseshoe Bend:

link

Or perhaps the fortifications for the United States at New Orleans?

Rudysnelson04 Jan 2018 5:29 p.m. PST

There are s illustrations of the fortifications at Horseshoe Bend.
Most Creek towns had vertical palisades with the natural curves of the logs.
There are a number of illustrations of the stockades by Americans or half-breeds. There are several interesting factors. For example most distances of the interior was set so defenders of one wall could turn around and fire at enemy crossing the opposite wall.
Check out Fort Mims which was larger than the average stockade.

Glengarry504 Jan 2018 6:11 p.m. PST

Of course the most famous field fortification of the war were the defenses outside New Orleans

link

The most extensive "field" fortifications of the War of 1812 on the Canadian frontier may have been the American defenses of Fort Erie (which had become more of an entrenched camp than a fort) and the British siege works.
link

At the Battle of Chateauguay the Canadians constructed
a series of abatis (obstacles made of felled trees) in depth. In the heavily forested parts of Canada this was the easiest and quickest form of field fortification.

link

Skeptic04 Jan 2018 9:52 p.m. PST

Woodland Scenics tree armatures can be made into abatis…

Florida Tory08 Jan 2018 5:09 a.m. PST

The National Park Service published an exhaustive report about archaeological excavations of the Chalmette Battlefield in 2009.

link

(Warning: the report is in several files. Scroll down on the page to get to all of them.)

The authors make several points. One of the most important is that the current NPS reconstruction of the rampart is wrong. Jackson's rampart was much more extensive. It was designed by professionally trained military engineers' and meant to stand up to the heavy British artillery (18 and 24 pdrs). One of the conclusions I reached is that almost all scale models of field fortifications sold by wargame suppliers are laughably too small – the height and width of the earthworks, for example, should be at least 8 feet and 18-20 feet in scale, respectively. (Part III, Section 1, p. 459ff)

Rick

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.