Help support TMP

"Errata for DBA 3.0 I/32a (Western Chou) and I/32c?" Topic

3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board

Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board

403 hits since 30 Dec 2017
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Skeptic30 Dec 2017 11:15 a.m. PST

Both of the above lists mention I/14a (European Bronze Age???) as allies, but geography, time, and possible allies in the other direction imply that it should be I/14d (Chinese Border Tribes) and/or I/14f (Red Ti). Has any erratum been issued to this effect?

P.S.: TMP's limit on topic names strikes again, favo(u)ring vague headline-style topics and abbreviations!

Personal logo timurilank Supporting Member of TMP30 Dec 2017 12:20 p.m. PST

Skeptic and other interested parties.

Fellow members of the Fanaticus Forum have spend a hard two months compiling the anomalies found in the new versions.

Most are errors made through the expansion of the number of army list while others have encountered problems made by date changes due to new research. There are a number army lists that involved further research, such as the example you mentioned above.

The original thread is 37 pages long and can be found at the following link:


The compiled work covering the four books can be found here at page 5 of the same thread:


Do note, that the corrections will need to be reviewed by the rule's author before they make their way to a new 'edition', but we are confident that the collective effort will pass through with no problems.


Skeptic30 Dec 2017 1:01 p.m. PST

Thank you, Robert! I have appended a question about I/14f as an ally of I/32a and I/32c…

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.