"Did Roman centuries carry a standard or fieldsign" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The last - the most elusive - set of dino skellies...
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| Brownand | 26 Dec 2017 8:13 a.m. PST |
As the topic: did legionary or auxiliarry centuries carry any standard or field sign?
And if they did, how did these look? Thanks for answering |
| DrSkull | 26 Dec 2017 8:19 a.m. PST |
There was a soldier in each century with the title "signifer" I.e., "sign bearer", so one would assume there was a sign to bear. |
| GurKhan | 26 Dec 2017 9:21 a.m. PST |
|
| Brownand | 27 Dec 2017 1:34 a.m. PST |
Thanks very much for the links and information |
79thPA  | 27 Dec 2017 9:07 a.m. PST |
|
| goragrad | 28 Dec 2017 10:58 a.m. PST |
Interesting – I had remembered the maniple as the smallest unit to carry a standard. A reminder to keep more current with changes in archeology and history. |
|
