"Did Roman centuries carry a standard or fieldsign" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please don't make fun of others' membernames.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleBeowulf paints the prototypes for the Eureka Amazon Army.
Featured Workbench ArticleDJD Miniatures runs amok with a diorama of cavemen and the giant prehistoric armadillo!
Featured Profile ArticleYesthatphil is the winner of the June 2015 contest with this wonderful entry.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Brownand | 26 Dec 2017 9:13 a.m. PST |
As the topic: did legionary or auxiliarry centuries carry any standard or field sign? And if they did, how did these look? Thanks for answering |
DrSkull | 26 Dec 2017 9:19 a.m. PST |
There was a soldier in each century with the title "signifer" I.e., "sign bearer", so one would assume there was a sign to bear. |
GurKhan | 26 Dec 2017 10:21 a.m. PST |
|
Brownand | 27 Dec 2017 2:34 a.m. PST |
Thanks very much for the links and information |
79thPA | 27 Dec 2017 10:07 a.m. PST |
|
goragrad | 28 Dec 2017 11:58 a.m. PST |
Interesting – I had remembered the maniple as the smallest unit to carry a standard. A reminder to keep more current with changes in archeology and history. |
|