Help support TMP


"Littoral Combat Ship USS Little Rock Commissioned" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Hills for the Fulda Gap

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian decides on hills for his Team Yankee project.


Featured Workbench Article

Deep Dream: Editor Gwen Goes Air Force

Not just improving a photo, but transforming it using artificial intelligence.


Featured Profile Article

Checking Out a Boardgame, Episode II

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks for scenario material in a World War IV boardgame.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


861 hits since 18 Dec 2017
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian18 Dec 2017 6:52 p.m. PST

A commissioning ceremony was held in Buffalo, N.Y. today for USS Little Rock (LCS-9), the latest Freedom-class Littoral Combat Ship. The ceremony was held next to the museum ship, the decommissioned USS Little Rock (CG-4), a World War II-era Cleveland-class light cruiser that was converted to a guided-missile destroyer…

link

The Beast Rampant18 Dec 2017 10:56 p.m. PST

Looks like a floating Jersey barrier.

DrSkull19 Dec 2017 3:27 a.m. PST

From an etymological perspective, I'm curious why LITTORAL is spelled with two "t's", when the Latin word for seashore whence it comes--litus, litoris n.--only has 1.

Caedite Eos19 Dec 2017 3:57 a.m. PST

Mediaeval spelling mistake.

KniazSuvorov19 Dec 2017 4:33 a.m. PST

It's kind of damning to the USNI that they're still claiming the LCS are "modular" and "reconfigurable" "multi-mission ships", when people NOT responsible for naval intelligence have long known the ships will not be modular or reconfigurable.

General Kirchner19 Dec 2017 1:17 p.m. PST

what a waste of money.

too small to do anything of note, and too much money and too fragile to do any small and agile.

I am suprised they are still building them.

Lion in the Stars19 Dec 2017 2:46 p.m. PST

No, the ASuW, ASW, and Minehunting packages are working and available, if in small numbers. The problem is that there's really enough space in the hulls to field all three at the same time, but not enough crew to do any one of them.

The crews are even more over-tasked than submarine crews, and I thought I'd never say that. LCS needs about twice the current crew to do all the missions!

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.