Help support TMP


"Free Corps, Free Legions " Topic


6 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Fire and Steel


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

28mm Soldaten Hulmutt Jucken

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


722 hits since 30 Nov 2017
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Osage201730 Nov 2017 11:02 a.m. PST

What was the reasoning behind forming the various Free Corps, Free Legions etc. ? Why not call them simply brigade, division, and so on ?

With the exception of the King's German Legion, and one or two Austrian legions, were they always poor quality ?

rmaker30 Nov 2017 11:28 a.m. PST

They were "free" in the sense that they were outside the established forces of the using nation. They were often made up of foreign personnel, including the officers. Some, like Lutzow's Freikorps, were privately raised and placed at the disposition of the nation. The KGL was, in effect, the Hanoverian Army-in-Exile.

And many were of good quality. Lutzow's certainly was. The Legion Portugaise acquitted itself well in Russia. The Russo-German Legion, Like Lutzow's, was good enough to be incorporated into the Prussian Army in 1815.

Rudysnelson30 Nov 2017 12:06 p.m. PST

A key component was as raker stated. Most of these were raised when the official Prussian government was allied with France. They were financed by private citizens who got weapons and uniforms from various sources.
As noted the term Legion was used when it was a combined arms organization. There was also aStreifkorps though my spelling may be off. hellwig was the commander.
The Portuguese Legion, as noted had a strong history and plenty of men in the unit. They too had all three branches.
I am not sure about the French Dalmatia or Croatian Legion having cavalry or artillery. Maybe the artillery was assigned to forts.

Glengarry530 Nov 2017 2:00 p.m. PST

There was a regiment of Croatian Hussars.

14Bore30 Nov 2017 2:29 p.m. PST

David Nash listed around a half dozen units the Prussians formed with permission of the King. Schill brother of the killed in a uprising had a Hussar unit,

attilathepun4730 Nov 2017 9:40 p.m. PST

The German term "frei" in the context of these unit names is sort of a short-hand for "freiwilliger," meaning literally freewill, in the sense of volunteer. Quite a few freicorps units were raised in Prussia during the desperate days of the Seven Years War, when the country was threatened with annihilation by numerous enemies. At that time, most were considered inferior to regular units, but useful for skirmishing and irregular warfare.

As others have indicated, during the Napoleonic era, the quality varied depending on leadership and discipline. I will note that although termed a legion, because it consisted of all arms, the King's German Legion was a body of regular troops forming a part of the British Army and subject to its rigorous discipline.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.