"Foundry Eastern Auxillary Archers" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Product Reviews Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Profile Article
|
Leadjunky | 27 Nov 2017 8:30 p.m. PST |
My Romans are for Caesar's time. Would the Syrian archer figures be suitable for Rome's enemies such as Pontic mercenary archers or even earlier Sellucid? |
GurKhan | 28 Nov 2017 2:06 a.m. PST |
Do you mean these guys – link and/or link ? Based on Trajan's Column; some historians argue that they don't represent anything accurately but are pure artistic inventions; certainly they don't seem to be represented quite like this in any other source. Personally, I wouldn't use them for Pontics (don't see the long skirt being likely in that area) nor Seleucids (the Roman short sword and the framed helmet seem out of period). But I don't think anyone's going to laugh and point fingers if you do. |
Prince Rupert of the Rhine | 28 Nov 2017 3:17 a.m. PST |
Late era Seleucid archers are most likely to be Cretans (not necessarily from Crete but that time it was more a style of soldier than a nationality) which would mean a light archer with short sword, small shield and no armour. Early Seleucid might have "Persian" archers but they would most likely look like late Persians in Median dress ( ie trousers). |
Leadjunky | 28 Nov 2017 9:22 p.m. PST |
Thanks. I have plenty of Greek and Cretan Bowmen so I guess I am covered. |
|