"Guibert: Father of Napoleon's Grande Armée " Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article The Editor dabbles with online printing.
Featured Profile Article
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Sparta | 23 Nov 2017 1:46 a.m. PST |
Quimbys book, the Background to Napolonic warfare, is the best I have read on the subject of how formations were choosen and maneuvered. Has anyone who has read that and also read the new Guibert: Father of Napoleon's Grande Armée (Campaigns and Commanders Series) Does it add anything? |
| Brechtel198 | 23 Nov 2017 5:13 a.m. PST |
I have it and Quimby is much better. And the idea in the title is just 'a little' overblown. The French reformers were not restricted to Guibert. For example, Gribeauval's reforms were larger and more far reaching, and Guibert somewhat disavowed himself of what he wrote later. And the Grande Armee was Napoleon's creation, not Guibert's. Guibert had influence with his initial study, but de Broglie, Rochambeau, and others were the initial implementors of the new French tactical system in the maneuvers in Normandy in the mid-1770s. |
| von Winterfeldt | 23 Nov 2017 11:52 a.m. PST |
a most boring book, in immense detail you learn in what circles you had to be to gain attention and promotion. |
| Sparta | 26 Nov 2017 11:41 p.m. PST |
Thank you – then I can skip that without missing out:-) |
|
looks at the new U.S.S. Constitution for Black Seas.
