Help support TMP


"Total Games Played & Different Games Played" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Wargaming in General Message Board


Action Log

29 Jun 2018 10:51 a.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

General

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article

Transporting the Simians

How to store and transport an army of giant apes?


Featured Workbench Article

Experimenting with SketchUp

When Ran The Cid says "SketchUp," the Editor listens...


Featured Profile Article


Featured Book Review


739 hits since 21 Nov 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Whirlwind21 Nov 2017 7:55 p.m. PST

Have you noticed in your own gaming, or that of others, a relationship either positive or negative between the number of games a player plays overall and the number of different games or rules they play?

1 – Gamers who play more games tend to stick to fewer different games.

2 – Gamers who play more games tend to be the ones who play the widest variety of games.

3 – I have never seen a relation between the two.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP22 Nov 2017 4:56 a.m. PST

1, though my experience may be wildly atypical.

I suspect part of it is practice: armies you play with regularly tend to be more complete and better painted. Also it's easier to devise a good scenario when you've ironed out all the rules ambiguities and have enough play to know what sort of edge the attacker needs under a given set of conditions.

advocate22 Nov 2017 11:11 a.m. PST

3. Before the great schism at our club, we were split fairly evenly between people who played one or two games, and those that played a variety. Both groups included people who played each week, and those that played less regularly.

UshCha30 Nov 2017 1:04 p.m. PST

1. To fight any army properly takes lots of games. Even if you play every week (whic I do) you need lots of weeks. Changeing games regularly would make this impossible.

Plus to me gaming is integral with my interest in Histoty of WW2 and on. No real interest in many other periods so no interest in playing them.

Personal logo etotheipi Sponsoring Member of TMP30 Nov 2017 1:12 p.m. PST

While my experience says 3, intellectually I want it to be 1 simply because there is lower overhead, which would make the (intellectual) barrier to entry for different games lower.

Of course, it depends on what counts as a "different" game.

Supply train ambush/defense in TSATF and Pulp Alley are probably more similar than village raid and open field army engagement in SAGA.

Whirlwind01 Dec 2017 11:33 a.m. PST

Of course, it depends on what counts as a "different" game.

I was thinking of a single set of rules, or game such as "X-Wing" or "Space Hulk" or whatever.

Rudysnelson01 Dec 2017 11:47 a.m. PST

3

Old Contemptibles01 Dec 2017 10:59 p.m. PST

Do you mean games or rules sets?

Whirlwind02 Dec 2017 6:09 a.m. PST

I mean do those who play a smaller number of different rulesets play a greater or smaller number of games.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP02 Dec 2017 8:31 a.m. PST

I started playing War on all types since the '60s … So I been around that block quite a few times … old fart

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.