"Equivalent frigates?" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Naval Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Current Poll
|
| Weirdo | 09 Nov 2017 2:18 p.m. PST |
So I'm almost done painting another batch of ships, among them a pair of Karel Doormans (I think they're also called M-Frigates) which have no stats in Naval Command, my ruleset of choice. Rather than try and extrapolate gaming stats on my own, it occurs to me that the abstracted nature of Naval Command means the Karel Doorman might actually end up with stats identical to a class with published stats. The question is…which one? I'm leaning towards the O H Perry class, but if anyone has better suggestions, I'd love to know. Thanks! |
| Onomarchos | 09 Nov 2017 3:36 p.m. PST |
I would go with the Knox class. The Perry class has the SM-1 AAM that the Doormam does not have. |
| David Manley | 10 Nov 2017 7:49 a.m. PST |
The Karel Doormans are more akin to a T23, more modern, more survivable, better armed. One of my international work colleagues was a senior government designer on the project, and I have spent a while visiting the ships in various places over the years |
| David Manley | 10 Nov 2017 7:52 a.m. PST |
Mind you I can't check if here are T23 stats but I'm assuming yes |
| Weirdo | 24 Nov 2017 2:59 p.m. PST |
Don't know of anything called the T23. Are you talking about the Type 23 or Duke-class? |
| Weirdo | 05 Jan 2018 4:20 p.m. PST |
Any other thoughts our clarifications on this? |
|
makes flight stands for 1/300 scale aircraft.