| D6 Junkie | 30 Oct 2017 12:50 p.m. PST |
Assuming all good wargaming buddies,
do you usually
prefer a 1 to 1 match up or a 4+ player game. |
 McKinstry   | 30 Oct 2017 1:03 p.m. PST |
|
 T Callahan | 30 Oct 2017 1:04 p.m. PST |
|
| Billy Goat Wargaming | 30 Oct 2017 1:12 p.m. PST |
2 v 2 or 3 v 3. This is a social hobby for me. |
| Tom Reed | 30 Oct 2017 1:20 p.m. PST |
|
| Sir Walter Rlyeh | 30 Oct 2017 1:23 p.m. PST |
Having multiple folks on a side does a good job of replicating the fog of war. Also, it's just fun. |
| robert piepenbrink | 30 Oct 2017 1:26 p.m. PST |
1 to 1 usually. But in a way 4+ isn't big enough. Six players, for me, just means we're all waiting for Joe to finish his map-marking, or Sam and Harry have a long melee to finish at the other end of the table, and where did I put that book?
But when you've got a dozen or more players and you're fighting a seriously big historical battle, there's a different thrill. |
| Mick the Metalsmith | 30 Oct 2017 1:27 p.m. PST |
1 on 1 since orchestrating schedules is such a pain. |
| Glengarry5 | 30 Oct 2017 1:29 p.m. PST |
Group, plenty of blame to go around when you lose! |
| Joes Shop | 30 Oct 2017 1:36 p.m. PST |
|
| D6 Junkie | 30 Oct 2017 2:08 p.m. PST |
I did a small post on why I like Big games
link |
 Doctor X | 30 Oct 2017 2:14 p.m. PST |
They both have their purposes but overall group because of the social involvement. |
| wolvermonkey | 30 Oct 2017 2:26 p.m. PST |
|
| roving bandit | 30 Oct 2017 2:30 p.m. PST |
I really only game in groups of four or more, or I just game solo. |
| Ceterman | 30 Oct 2017 3:09 p.m. PST |
Groups, by far. We usually have 2 vs 2. Sometimes 3 vs 3, if we are lucky! |
| Oberlindes Sol LIC | 30 Oct 2017 3:21 p.m. PST |
Group, definitely. Fog of war, communications problems, mutinies -- we love it all. |
 Saber6 | 30 Oct 2017 3:49 p.m. PST |
|
| Dynaman8789 | 30 Oct 2017 4:09 p.m. PST |
|
| brass1 | 30 Oct 2017 4:54 p.m. PST |
1v1, largely because I only have one dependable opponent. LT |
| princeman | 30 Oct 2017 5:43 p.m. PST |
Both – any time we can get together s quality time. |
| Ragbones | 30 Oct 2017 6:06 p.m. PST |
|
| whill4 | 30 Oct 2017 6:26 p.m. PST |
|
| FusilierDan | 30 Oct 2017 6:48 p.m. PST |
I prefer group games but it's a 55/45 split. I wouldn't miss a night of gaming because it was only going to be one on one. |
| 21eRegt | 30 Oct 2017 7:49 p.m. PST |
Group, 4-6 is ideal to me. One on one games tend to get personal over time in my experience. |
| Rich Bliss | 30 Oct 2017 8:24 p.m. PST |
|
| Rhysius Cambrensis | 31 Oct 2017 6:49 a.m. PST |
1-on-1 just me and my buddy and no one else trying to butt in on our games or manipulate a command on one side or t'other and therefore hi-jack our pre-arranged game with our miniatures! |
| SultanSevy | 31 Oct 2017 8:32 p.m. PST |
1 vs 1 is the best if you really want to focus on the game. I like groups because the shared social aspect is so fun, but they slow down play in my experience. |
| andysyk | 01 Nov 2017 2:40 p.m. PST |
|
 etotheipi  | 01 Nov 2017 5:17 p.m. PST |
1 v 1 v 1 v 1 v 1 Games with more than two sides, but usually one player per side. |
| Winston Smith | 02 Nov 2017 6:21 p.m. PST |
Group, by default. That's all we play. 
Usually 3x3 but the games are usually set up so if more show up, we can handle them. We can depend on 6 Regulars. Or 7….
So I buy, paint and organize accordingly. |
