Help support TMP


"HMS Terror" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board

Back to the Early 20th Century Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

19th Century
World War One

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Rebasing My 6mm A7Vs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian rebases some old soldiers.


Featured Workbench Article

Tony Builds and Paints a Khang Robot

Tony shows how he puts together and paints a Flash Gordon-inspired sci-fi pulp robot.


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Battlefront's Rural Fields and Fences

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian gets his hands on some fields and fences.


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,292 hits since 29 Oct 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

monk2002uk29 Oct 2017 4:50 a.m. PST

Here is a photo of the Navis-Neptune 1/1250 scale model of HMS Terror, a monitor:

link

Robert

KniazSuvorov29 Oct 2017 7:40 a.m. PST

I think modern navies--the USN in particular--could learn a lot by taking a look at these old monitors. Namely, a shore-bombardment platform doesn't need to be a multi-billion-dollar monstrosity; just slap a couple of big guns on a raft with engines.

Lion in the Stars29 Oct 2017 3:09 p.m. PST

It's a lot cheaper to make a missile that fits into existing launchers (that you can swap out loadings for different missions).

Building a monitor in today's world requires a hull with enough defenses to deal with modern shore defenses: 200km-range anti-ship missile swarms.

Which means that the 'cheap' hull is going to need a billion dollars of equipment.

Vimy Ridge29 Oct 2017 3:22 p.m. PST

Smart mines, wake homing torpedos, shore based torpedo batteries (mobile ones at that!) go fast and so much more would render a vessel like a cheap grave for its crew I think.

Shawn

monk2002uk31 Oct 2017 4:05 a.m. PST

Here is another view of HMS Terror in a different role, which never eventuated:

link

Robert

David Manley31 Oct 2017 10:53 a.m. PST

They did trial the pontoon however….

picture

monk2002uk31 Oct 2017 1:05 p.m. PST

They did, yes. British 1st Division conducted practice landings with tanks and cyclists. The Battle of Third Ypres had not progressed far enough to enable the landing to succeed. This will not stop me trying it as a 'what if' though…

Robert

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.