"Fighting the Battle of the Tagus, 220 BC" Topic
3 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article The final warband for the Army for Bill.
Featured Profile Article The Editor is invited to tour the factory of Simtac, a U.S. manufacturer of figures in nearly all periods, scales, and genres.
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
 timurilank  | 25 Oct 2017 3:01 a.m. PST |
Full report with photos can be found at the blog.
The ending is surprising. link Cheers,
Robert |
| Sydney Gamer | 25 Oct 2017 4:39 a.m. PST |
Very interesting example of DBA for an unusual historical refight. To what extent did you modify the rules for river crossings? |
| timurilank | 25 Oct 2017 5:55 a.m. PST |
Each column could move 1BW (Base Width) per bound through the river for zero pip cost. This is similar to the continuation of movement on roads for zero pip cost. That left the actual pip score for each tribe, the Carpetani, Olcadian, and Vaccean, available for the formation of battle lines on the opposite bank. A similar system can be used for Hannibal's opposed crossing of the Rhone River by the Volcae. |
|
