Help support TMP


"Fighting the Battle of the Tagus, 220 BC" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Armati


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Grade My Gauls

At last! Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian finally paints the first of his Gauls...


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


668 hits since 25 Oct 2017
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
timurilank25 Oct 2017 3:01 a.m. PST

Full report with photos can be found at the blog.
The ending is surprising.

link

Cheers,
Robert

Sydney Gamer25 Oct 2017 4:39 a.m. PST

Very interesting example of DBA for an unusual historical refight. To what extent did you modify the rules for river crossings?

timurilank25 Oct 2017 5:55 a.m. PST

Each column could move 1BW (Base Width) per bound through the river for zero pip cost. This is similar to the continuation of movement on roads for zero pip cost.

That left the actual pip score for each tribe, the Carpetani, Olcadian, and Vaccean, available for the formation of battle lines on the opposite bank.

A similar system can be used for Hannibal's opposed crossing of the Rhone River by the Volcae.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.