"Naval Thunder and Grandfleets3: Time of play" Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Naval Gaming 1898-1929 Message Board
Areas of Interest19th Century
World War One
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.
Featured Workbench Article Not just improving a photo, but transforming it using artificial intelligence.
Featured Profile Article The importance and use of chemical warfare in WWI and its application to tabletop wargames.
Featured Book Review
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| dantheman | 24 Oct 2017 2:04 p.m. PST |
I looked at both rules and am interested in how quick they are. Given, let's say, the battle of Dogger Bank with 4 to 6 people, how long will the scenario take to play? Please refrain from which rules are ‘better' and why. I am more interested in speed of play. |
 McKinstry   | 24 Oct 2017 3:21 p.m. PST |
I've never heard of Grandfleets 3? Any chance you mean General Quarters 3? Both are about the same level of complexity and both play about the same pace. I have played Naval Thunder and I would rate it as between 2.5 and 4 hours for Dogger Bank. |
| Morning Scout | 24 Oct 2017 3:52 p.m. PST |
|
| Major Mike | 24 Oct 2017 4:15 p.m. PST |
|
| dantheman | 24 Oct 2017 6:44 p.m. PST |
Thanks for the input but I am looking at these two rules only, with questions limited to time of play. WTJ is for pre-dread anyway. |
| Forager | 24 Oct 2017 9:51 p.m. PST |
Corrected link for Majestic 12 Games, makers of Grand Fleets 3rd Edition: mj12games.com I think GF3 would play significantly faster…maybe a couple hours or less for a Dogger Bank game if using capital ships only. Combat has been streamlined quite a bit and is pretty lethal. Too much so, for my tastes. Naval Thunder plays more like GF2 (which I prefer to both of these). It has more detail (moderate level), but it's going to play slower. McKinstry's time estimate for NT looks reasonably accurate. |
| dantheman | 25 Oct 2017 4:26 a.m. PST |
Thanks. I would definitely want to include all the ships. Eliminating the light forces, is definitely not an option. Anything less is a shoot em up game with no basis in history or era tactics. |
| Wilf12358 | 25 Oct 2017 5:13 a.m. PST |
I have both NT and GF3 and would agree that GF3 plays faster and is more lethal. |
|
