"Rules Length & Rules Lawyers" Topic
52 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Game Design Message Board
Action Log
23 May 2019 1:30 p.m. PST by Editor in Chief Bill
- Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board
Areas of InterestGeneral
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase ArticleHow does coverbinding work?
Featured Workbench ArticleEveryone has a pile of shame - miniatures that you were all hot to get, had big plans for, and then never did anything with...
Featured Profile ArticleDelayed by circumstances, the 2016 Christmas Project finally arrives!
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Pages: 1 2
Blutarski | 30 Oct 2017 9:10 p.m. PST |
We'll have to agree to disagree, Otto. Cheaters are usually cowardly sneaks. Nothing lower IMO. B |
Thomas Thomas | 31 Oct 2017 9:53 a.m. PST |
Again clear concise but complete rules solve rule lawyering (and they may just be trying to get an explaintion and may just disagree on what the rule means or what "simulation" effect its trying to create. "A wall spell may be cast within X distance of the caster but may not be cast on any living creature." Most Naplonic rules have been overly complex and poorly explained hence the difficulty. Umpires don't help as players just become lawyers submitting briefs to the umpire to have him/her rule in their favor. TomT |
Pages: 1 2
|