Help support TMP


"Trade and Development: Evidence from the Napoleonic" Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not use bad language on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Media Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Workbench Article

Painting 6mm Baccus Napoleonic British Infantry

After many years of resisting the urge to start a Napoleonic collection, Monkey Hanger Fezian takes the plunge!


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Streets & Sidewalks

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian looks at some new terrain products, which use space age technology!


528 hits since 20 Oct 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0120 Oct 2017 12:14 p.m. PST

"This paper uses a natural experiment to assess whether temporary protection fromtrade with the industrial leader can foster development in infant industries in follower
countries. Using a new dataset compiled from primary sources, I show that regions(départements) in the French Empire which became better protected from trade with
the British for exogenous reasons during the Napoleonic Wars (1803-15) increasedcapacity in mechanised cotton spinning to a larger extent than regions which remained
more exposed to trade. Temporary protection from trade proved to have long-termeffects. First, after the restoration of peace, exports of cotton goods in France grew
faster than Britain's exports of the same. Second, emulation of Britain's success wasnot inevitable. As late as 1850, France and Belgium – both part of the French Empire
prior to 1815, had larger cotton spinning industries than other Continental Europeancountries. Third, within France, firms in areas that benefited from more protection during the Napoleonic Wars had significantly higher labour productivity in cotton spinning in 1840 than regions which received a smaller shock…."
Main page
PDF link

Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.