Help support TMP


"Ignore the Name, the M-1A2SEPV3 Is a New Tank" Topic


4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

A Fistful of Kung Fu


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,082 hits since 13 Oct 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0113 Oct 2017 4:15 p.m. PST

"he U.S. Army just got a new tank. But you wouldn't know it from the way the ground-combat branch describes the vehicle.

On Oct. 4, 2017, the Army's program office for ground vehicles announced that the service had accepted the first M-1A2SEPV3 "on schedule and on budget." General Dynamics Land Systems builds the tank in Lima, Ohio, using existing M-1 hulls as a starting point.

The Army asked to buy 56 M-1A2SEPV3 tanks in 2018, against a total requirement for around a thousand of the new vehicles — enough to equip all of the branch's active-duty tank brigades. At present, a V3 costs around $20 USD million. The price should drop as the production rate increases…"
Main page
warisboring.com/46306-2


Amicalement
Armand

bsrlee14 Oct 2017 1:48 a.m. PST

Just doing what the US Navy did in the later 1800's, 'rebuilding' Civil War monitors into pre-dreadnoughts. They put the monitor into drydock and stripped it completely then built a pre-dreadnought in the same slip from new materials and then riveted the original name plate on – Look Congress, its not a new ship

JMcCarroll14 Oct 2017 4:33 p.m. PST

Don't care how they do it. Just as long as it works!

Lion in the Stars14 Oct 2017 6:49 p.m. PST

Service Life Extension Version 3.

And honestly, no the US Army of WW2 would NOT have given this a new number.

The various Sherman versions were differentiated by mechanicals or hull construction, and this has the same engine and hull as the preceding Abrams.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.