/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory

"Ignore the Name, the M-1A2SEPV3 Is a New Tank" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article Can you identify the specialist?
Featured Book Review
Featured Movie Review
|
Tango01  | 13 Oct 2017 4:15 p.m. PST |
"he U.S. Army just got a new tank. But you wouldn't know it from the way the ground-combat branch describes the vehicle. On Oct. 4, 2017, the Army's program office for ground vehicles announced that the service had accepted the first M-1A2SEPV3 "on schedule and on budget." General Dynamics Land Systems builds the tank in Lima, Ohio, using existing M-1 hulls as a starting point. The Army asked to buy 56 M-1A2SEPV3 tanks in 2018, against a total requirement for around a thousand of the new vehicles — enough to equip all of the branch's active-duty tank brigades. At present, a V3 costs around $20 USD million. The price should drop as the production rate increases…" Main page warisboring.com/46306-2 Amicalement Armand
|
bsrlee | 14 Oct 2017 1:48 a.m. PST |
Just doing what the US Navy did in the later 1800's, 'rebuilding' Civil War monitors into pre-dreadnoughts. They put the monitor into drydock and stripped it completely then built a pre-dreadnought in the same slip from new materials and then riveted the original name plate on – Look Congress, its not a new ship |
JMcCarroll | 14 Oct 2017 4:33 p.m. PST |
Don't care how they do it. Just as long as it works! |
Lion in the Stars | 14 Oct 2017 6:49 p.m. PST |
Service Life Extension Version 3. And honestly, no the US Army of WW2 would NOT have given this a new number. The various Sherman versions were differentiated by mechanicals or hull construction, and this has the same engine and hull as the preceding Abrams. |
|