| Tango01 | 05 Oct 2017 12:33 p.m. PST |
Cool!
Main page link Amicalement
Armand |
| Hafen von Schlockenberg | 05 Oct 2017 12:49 p.m. PST |
Oh yes--though I wish they were 28mm. |
ZULUPAUL  | 05 Oct 2017 1:38 p.m. PST |
Always been intrigued with Chinese armies, luckily they are 1/72 scale so the temptation is gone! |
| skipper John | 05 Oct 2017 2:06 p.m. PST |
Wait! I thought 1/72 was… 25mm?? Can someone explain the differences? |
 Bobgnar | 05 Oct 2017 4:35 p.m. PST |
1/72 is closer to 20mm than to 25mm. But I cannot find the scale of these listed. |
| Hafen von Schlockenberg | 05 Oct 2017 7:16 p.m. PST |
True,but the blog name kind of gives it away. |
| Bobgnar | 06 Oct 2017 9:43 a.m. PST |
I looked only at the Ming, :( |
| Tango01 | 06 Oct 2017 11:02 a.m. PST |
Glad you like them my friend!.
Amicalement
Armand
|
| Hafen von Schlockenberg | 06 Oct 2017 1:35 p.m. PST |
I've always wondered why it seems so much easier to sculpt anatomically correct figures in 1/72-20mm than in 25-28mm. Does the slight increase in size cause problems, or is it just a matter of convention? |
| skipper John | 07 Oct 2017 5:55 a.m. PST |
Anyway…. they are outstanding and beautiful castings. They would be perfect to go along with my Samurai and Koreans but… they are not 28mm and would not fit with my Perry's. A pity. |
| Tango01 | 07 Oct 2017 10:56 a.m. PST |
Glad you like them too my friend!. (smile)
Amicalement
Armand
|
gets medieval.
