Help support TMP

"Why are there space uruks? " Topic

13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the SF Media Message Board

846 hits since 3 Oct 2017
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2017 10:36 a.m. PST

So watching first episode of discovery.
And therewa bunch of fanatical uruks doing mischief.

And why do they always feel the need to Bleeped text with canon?
If they wanted to make fancy looking effects and making the ships super high tech. Than set the series AFTER TNG universe not before.

And isn't this supposed to be around the time of TOS?
Why oh why Bleeped text with the time line. The history of trek from TOS to the end of TNG universe is well set. There isn't room to Bleeped text with it.

This is like Enterprise meets JJ verse.

DesertScrb03 Oct 2017 11:06 a.m. PST

Because it's a fictional television show, not a documentary.

Dezmond03 Oct 2017 11:18 a.m. PST

I've seen some suggestion it's a result of them piggybacking off the licence agreed to allow the making of the abramstrek movies, so while they can use names they are not permitted to use designs from previous series.

But seriously dude, let it go. They have made it abundantly clear if you liked old Star Trek your face isn't welcome any more.

Syrinx003 Oct 2017 1:00 p.m. PST

They certainly did. I stopped following ST after the first movie. I'm not a big fan of Abrams overall.

We did have fun watching Discovery in a bar with the sound off while poking fun at the orks in gold warhammer fantasy armor.

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP03 Oct 2017 2:15 p.m. PST

Then they shouldn't have made the series instead of taking a giant diarrheaic Bleeped text on the Canon and franchise.
Why call it star trek when there is no star trek in it.

MajorB03 Oct 2017 2:22 p.m. PST

"Why are there space uruks? "

Why not?

Major B03 Oct 2017 4:06 p.m. PST

Cannot say I have watched any of the series in full except for the original and the first set of movies.

The original.

Calico Bill03 Oct 2017 7:52 p.m. PST

Agreed. A sad ending to Star Trek.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2017 9:21 a.m. PST

"Canon"? In Star a Trek?
That was thrown under the bus 3 movies ago.

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2017 9:40 a.m. PST

There was nothing wrong with Star Trek Generations. A bit boring but nothing wrong Canon wise.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2017 2:44 p.m. PST

No Jar Jar Binks?

Mithmee Supporting Member of TMP04 Oct 2017 6:26 p.m. PST

Yet give it time.

Legion 406 Oct 2017 12:36 p.m. PST

It's a big ST Galaxy … So they could write in and write out many races. E.g. Did we ever see much of the blue skinned aliens with antennas, the Andorians in TNG ? As we saw in the original ST and prequel series Enterprise.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.