Help support TMP


"The Sinhung APC" Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't make fun of others' membernames.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board

Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

FUBAR


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Stuff It! (In a Box)

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian worries about not losing his rules stuff.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


1,073 hits since 23 Sep 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0123 Sep 2017 10:27 p.m. PST

"When the North Korean Army needed an armored personnel carrier, they turned to what they do best – license production of an existing (and proven) system from one of their few global allies, the Chinese. The VTT-323 (M1973 "Sinhung") was born as a locally-produced copy of the NORINCO YW 531C series armored personnel carrier. As such, the VTT-323 shares much in common with the original Chinese offering and grows the mobility and reach of North Korean land forces even further. The VTT-323 has since become the standard North Korean Army Armored Personnel Carrier and would no doubt be fielded in force during an invasion scenario involving South Korea. It is assumed that the VTT-323 began operational service with the North Korean People's Army (NKPA) sometime in 1973…"
Main page
link


Model…

picture


Main page
ghqmodels.com/store/nk2.html


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse24 Sep 2017 2:49 p.m. PST

Ah yeah … looks like a good target …

Tango0124 Sep 2017 3:04 p.m. PST

(smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Lion in the Stars25 Sep 2017 2:59 a.m. PST

Hey, it's even in your scale, L4!

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse25 Sep 2017 8:28 a.m. PST

evil grin Yes it is!

BenFromBrooklyn26 Sep 2017 8:02 a.m. PST

They are fielded in force for parades, drills, and demonstrations.
In a shooting war the Norks wouldn't be so stupid as to give the US and ROK armies such easy targets as APC's that are "meh" by Cold War standards. These vehicles would be used largely as decoys, as the main infantry attacks proceeded entirely on foot.

On the off chance that they ARE that stupid… one never really knows. There are American privates with more combat experience than north Korea's commanding generals.

Personal logo Legion 4 Supporting Member of TMP In the TMP Dawghouse26 Sep 2017 3:12 p.m. PST

There are American privates with more combat experience than north Korea's commanding generals.
No doubt … As I have said on other threads. It would be a bloody continuation of the conflict, as it is only a "truce". Since '53.
But the NoKos would be defeated totally, however the cost to many South Korean non-combatants would be very high. Not to mention military losses to the ROKs and US.

As would the North's. Their military would be totally destroyed. Un's ability to hit Seoul, even with limited rockets/missiles etc. After most will have been shot down or destroyed before firing. The losses to Seoul would still be high.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.