Help support TMP

"M60A2" Topic

13 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2006) Message Board

Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board

771 hits since 22 Sep 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP23 Sep 2017 3:26 p.m. PST



Main page



Personal logo Murphy Sponsoring Member of TMP23 Sep 2017 8:34 p.m. PST

Can't be an A2..I don't see the accompanying set of hull and turret mechanics working like crazy to keep the damn thing running….

Dynaman878924 Sep 2017 3:28 a.m. PST

First time I saw this thing I thought it was a joke.

RudyNelson24 Sep 2017 6:16 a.m. PST

All of the main gun problems of the Sheridan, misleading electronics and still having the use the WW2 era V sight. Plus all of the track maint headaches of the M60A1. They had a battalion of them in another brigade.

Legion 424 Sep 2017 8:43 a.m. PST

Yes, the "old timers" in our Tank & Mech Bns talked about what a maint. nightmare those were. And many spent most of the time in the Motor Pool. Never even saw them sold to other countries, like other versions of the M60, etc., … I'm sure no one would want them either !

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 Sep 2017 11:50 a.m. PST



Lion in the Stars25 Sep 2017 1:59 a.m. PST

Weren't all the M60A2s converted to either A3s or the engineer tanks?

Legion 425 Sep 2017 7:29 a.m. PST

Good to know Lion, if true. There was nothing wrong with the hulls.

Murvihill25 Sep 2017 8:59 a.m. PST

The first set of modern microarmor tanks I bought. I didn't know any better, then found out that I really couldn't use them. Not sure where they ended up.

emckinney25 Sep 2017 10:19 a.m. PST

I remember how cool looking they were when I was a kid …

It might have been a good idea if the main gun/electronics problems had been worked out. The Soviets sure ended up in love with the gun-launched missile concept.

RudyNelson25 Sep 2017 3:26 p.m. PST

The M60A2 did not have all the firing electronics issues that my M551 had. When we fired the main gun 152mm round, the recoil lifted the tracks to the third road wheel and you could not fire it over the side at all. Anyway the bounce was what messed up the missile firing systems. So in exercises we would fire all the missiles first which was not that many before using the 152mm rounds.

The M60A2 did not have to worry about the bounce but the Main gun recoil would still have a chance to mess up the firing system. An interesting game design option for Modern tank vs tank combat.

Legion 426 Sep 2017 6:19 a.m. PST

You would think they would have known that when testing the M551. About the "bounce" messing with the electronics, etc. But this wasn't the first time something like this happened with equipment issues.

ScoutJock26 Sep 2017 12:36 p.m. PST

One of our Cobra crew chiefs had an mos as a turret mechanic prior to switching to aviation. He said the hydraulics in the starships made the Cobra system look like hooking up a garden hose.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.