"Two Scenarios Posted: Aspern-Essling and Waterloo" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Remember that you can Stifle members so that you don't have to read their posts.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonics Scenarios Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article Containers for when you need to sideline that project you've been working on, or maybe just not lose the bits you're not ready for yet.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
|
| sotek486 | 14 Sep 2017 6:01 p.m. PST |
I've posted up two scenarios this past week – one for Aspern-Essling and the other for Waterloo. Both are designed for 28mm armies. Aspern-Essling: link Map:
Orders of battle on the blog post. Waterloo: link Map:
Orders of battle on the blog post. I'll be running both of these games at forthcoming conventions. |
Frederick  | 14 Sep 2017 6:31 p.m. PST |
Thanks! I have no Brits so Waterloo is out – but Aspern-Essling looks very promising! |
| COL Scott ret | 14 Sep 2017 9:39 p.m. PST |
Fred you can always change the armies and play it out. I have heard that even famous battlefields still can offer new insight just by changing names and armies. |
| nsolomon99 | 14 Sep 2017 10:27 p.m. PST |
Aspern-Essling is one of my favourite battles! Can I suggest that you need extra room on either flank to allow for the historical Austrian assaults against both Aspern & Esslin. Rosenberg and especially Hiller attacked more from the flanks. |
| sotek486 | 15 Sep 2017 11:09 a.m. PST |
I've folded the flanks around to keep it on a 8 foot by 6 foot table (using 28mm figures). Had to compress it. |
|
goes to sea with the Terrain Mat.
