Help support TMP


"Pirate Flag for US Submarine" Topic


22 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board


Areas of Interest

Modern

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

One-Hour Skirmish Wargames


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Profile Article

Council of Five Nations 2010

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian is back from Council of Five Nations.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


Featured Movie Review


1,504 hits since 14 Sep 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian14 Sep 2017 12:11 p.m. PST

One of the United States' most advanced nuclear submarines returned to port in Washington state this week flying a Jolly Roger, a move steeped in maritime lore and mystery…

link

JimDuncanUK14 Sep 2017 1:00 p.m. PST

I understand that the Royal Navy is allowed under its rules of engagement to intercept and engage any vessels flying the Jolly Roger in isolation.

Can anyone more knowledgeable comment?

Winston Smith14 Sep 2017 1:35 p.m. PST

They were resupplying the Somali Pirates. The Navy Department is strapped for cash.

peterx Supporting Member of TMP14 Sep 2017 2:44 p.m. PST

They boarded, looted and sunk another ship, taking all the gold, jewels, weapons and ladies back on board their vessel and home to Washington State. Then there will be drunken feasting and revelry until the gold runs out. That is traditional.

Lion in the Stars14 Sep 2017 4:01 p.m. PST

Huh, not a broom, so no torpedoes fired. (Broom meaning a 'clean sweep' of all torpedoes hitting their targets)

Must have been some other mission, most likely screwing with the Russians in the Sea of Okhostk (or however the heck you spell that).

The Carter is one of the Special Ops boats, doing stuff like in Blind Man's Bluff. In fact, the Carter is the replacement for the old Parche, the second major covert-ops boat. First major covert-ops boat was the Halibut, due to her large hangar for Regulus missiles. Once the SSBNs took over the nuclear deterrent job, that left a sub with a very large open space to do interesting things with.

Personal logo McKinstry Supporting Member of TMP Fezian14 Sep 2017 7:47 p.m. PST

Didn't Conqueror fly a Jolly Roger returning home after sinking Belgrano?

As I recall there was a certain amount of wailing and knashing of teeth associated with that.

foxweasel14 Sep 2017 11:34 p.m. PST

Yes it did fly it, I thought it was highly amusing at the time and I think Mrs T did as well.

Cacique Caribe15 Sep 2017 5:27 a.m. PST

Maybe it's a sign they had good hunting.

Dan

Bellbottom15 Sep 2017 1:57 p.m. PST

It's a long tradition in RN subs

Charlie 1215 Sep 2017 6:23 p.m. PST

Yes it did fly it

Not "it". "She"….

foxweasel15 Sep 2017 11:51 p.m. PST

Well it is the Navy, you must be right as everything's a bit feminine or as camp as a row of tents. And they drive boats not ships.

Supercilius Maximus17 Sep 2017 1:49 p.m. PST

All revealed here:-

link

Reasons for flying the JR go beyond sinking an enemy ship and include successful deployments of special forces, and at sea rescues.

Lion in the Stars17 Sep 2017 8:34 p.m. PST

Yes, "good hunting" would be a decent description for flying the Jolly Roger on a sub.

SouthernPhantom18 Sep 2017 9:07 a.m. PST

Knowing what the Carter is fitted out for – a special-missions module making her 100ft longer than the other Seawolf-class boats – I presume the reason has something to do with ISR in some capacity. There were some rumors that the Carter has launched UAVs in the past; successful target recon flights on the Korean peninsula are impressive, but not on the same level as sinking an enemy combatant. I'm guessing something a bit riskier – loitering in DPRK waters for an extended period during a wiretap or other operation would be my guess.

Lion in the Stars18 Sep 2017 5:05 p.m. PST

Launching a UAV does mean being on the surface for a good 15-30 minutes, it's not like modern subs can crash-dive like the old WW2 boats could.

PMC31719 Sep 2017 4:59 a.m. PST

Lion – why on earth not? I'd've thought that a crash-dive would be a fairly vital ability for any sub.

foxweasel19 Sep 2017 12:59 p.m. PST

I didn't know that either, I'm quite surprised they can't crash dive.

Lion in the Stars19 Sep 2017 5:55 p.m. PST

Modern subs don't spend time on the surface, we live *entirely* underwater.

The only time we're on the surface is when we're within sight of friendly land. And sometimes we will submerge even then. We usually submerged in the Straits of Juan de Fuca on the way out to sea, and had to be careful not to accidentally catch a fishing boat by the net and drag them under.

Also, remember that a WW2 sub was all of 2,400 tons submerged, and the Jimmy Carter is 12,000 tons. Even the 688/Los Angeles class was 7,500 tons, and the big Ohio-class I served on were 19,000 tons.

Takes a lot longer for the additional mass to start moving.

foxweasel20 Sep 2017 12:02 a.m. PST

Thanks for that, makes sense really when you think about it. In WW2 they didn't have RADAR to detect aircraft so didn't have much warning to dive.

Murvihill20 Sep 2017 9:48 a.m. PST

Umm, radar can be detected by ECM about twice the range it is effective at, so subs may not want to broadcast their position when they are on the surface by using it.

Lion in the Stars20 Sep 2017 4:26 p.m. PST

In friendly waters, you want your surface-search radar(s) on as much as possible.

You don't surface in unfriendly waters if you can avoid it.

Though we did pull a couple 'steel beach' picnics when the weather and seas were nice in the middle of the Pacific and we didn't have other obligations. A bit eerie swimming when there's 18,000ft of water under you!

But a modern submarine basically only surfaces when pulling into port. At all other times, we're completely submerged. Fresh air? Yeah, we did that sometimes, but it was usually by sticking up the snorkel mast and not running the diesel.

So if you're never on the surface in the first place, there's no need for the ability to crash dive. If we are at periscope depth, there are procedures for an Emergency Deep if a ship is going to run you over. But your ballast tanks are already full of water when you're at periscope depth, you come up to PD, not submerge to it.

Murvihill21 Sep 2017 12:47 p.m. PST

"A bit eerie swimming when there's 18,000ft of water under you!"

One of the things our lily-livered captain never let us do. I think it's the one thing I really miss being able to boast about. Oh and Subic (East Coast sailor). Never made shellback or bluenose, but who cares, those are just artificial lines on a globe.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.