Help support TMP


"Space Combat Rules" Topic


3 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the SF Discussion Message Board

Back to the Spaceship Gallery Message Board



580 hits since 11 Sep 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Morpheus197512 Sep 2017 7:20 a.m. PST

For spaceship games…..do you prefer to have a fixed number of actions that can increase as the ship's crew is more experienced or fixed commands?

Actions
1 Action is spent to
accelerate, decelerate or to provide additional turns
or
fire a weapon system
or
boost defenses/shields
or
land/launch fighters

Fixed Commands
Full Ahead
Concentrate Firepower
Weapons Free
All Stop
Come About
Ramming Speed

Personally I prefer actions because you have 2-3 actions for most ships and can perform them without having to memorize a command chart. Others prefer the cool names and the command chart. I think command charts will also require the game to use additional tokens on the table to mark what is doing what.

Thoughts?

Covert Walrus13 Sep 2017 10:32 a.m. PST

Playing Full Thrust most often, the subject hardly comes up; I do prefer the idea of action points if I was gaming such thing though.

I tend to believe a lot of actions in space combat would be perforce reactive as technology increases. For most Hard SF games of course, all the factors of movement and firing are fixed by physics and it's less up to command decisions once combat begins.

Morpheus197513 Sep 2017 11:51 a.m. PST

I see it as tech goes up your crew needs less work to brace or close blast doors or movement and can focus more on the things like combat ops and firing weapons and damage control…..

If I used fixed commands then I would have to assume a fixed tech level across the board.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.