
"These futuristic Royal Navy submarine concepts look..." Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 28 Aug 2017 10:08 p.m. PST |
… and act like fish. "Skip back 100 years and the world of warfare today looks almost unrecognisable. You'd think that would make predicting what military vehicles will look like in the future nigh-on impossible, but Britain's Royal Navy has other ideas. Its Nautilus 100 imagines the submarines and micro-drones that will be patrolling our oceans in 50 years. The work was commissioned to mark the 100th anniversary of the USS Nautilus, the world's first operational nuclear submarine. "The underwater battle space is a hugely challenging environment and it's predicted to remain so for a long time yet," says Peter Pipkin, the Royal Navy's fleet robotics officer. He continues to say the vehicles used in the future will be more autonomous and make use of other technologies still in development…" Main page link
Amicalement Armand |
Old Wolfman | 30 Aug 2017 6:42 a.m. PST |
One of them looks a bit like a large version of the "Flying Sub" from "Voyage To The Bottom Of The Sea". |
StarCruiser | 30 Aug 2017 7:15 a.m. PST |
More sci-fi/fantasy rather than practical – at least as of the near term… |
Tango01  | 30 Aug 2017 11:09 a.m. PST |
|
Lion in the Stars | 01 Sep 2017 5:41 p.m. PST |
"Operating in the underwater space is incredibly difficult, just sharing communications is difficult," Pipkin says. "Using a family of vehicles, or a swarm of unmanned underwater vehicles, can extend that communications range and create networks that form themselves." Anyone else see the logical disconnect here? "We can't talk underwater, so we're going to use a swarm of vehicles (that need to talk to each other)" Though technically the problem is that you can't talk *covertly* underwater. If you talk, everyone in the ocean can at least hear that someone is talking, even if you use some fancy encrypted system so that they can't hear what you're saying. |
|