"Why didn't Japanese infantrymen and samurai use shields?" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Classical Asian Warfare Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Medieval
Renaissance
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Recent Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Editor tries out a boardgame - yes, a boardgame - from battle-market magazine.
Featured Workbench Article wodger  begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.
Featured Profile Article For the time being, the last in our series of articles on the gates of Old Jerusalem.
Featured Book Review
|
The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 12 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango01  | 18 Aug 2017 9:55 p.m. PST |
Interesting question… " Shields were considered useful in Europe until the development of full plate armor. Despite the fact that they never had anything comparable to plate armor, shield use was apparently abandoned by the Edo period. The freestanding tate was used to protect archers, but aside from this, shields…"
Main page
link
Amicalement
Armand
|
| firebase2012 | 19 Aug 2017 1:25 a.m. PST |
check this out might explain why the samurai didn't use shields YouTube link The quality of their armor. |
| photocrinch | 19 Aug 2017 8:51 a.m. PST |
As is the classic Japanese bow which was a main weapon of the samurai. |
| Tango01 | 19 Aug 2017 11:03 a.m. PST |
So… a Roman shield could never have a chance…?
Amicalement
Armand
|
| optional field | 19 Aug 2017 12:59 p.m. PST |
I had never wondered about this before, but given that the importance of the bow in Japanese warfare, and difficulty of using a bow in combination with a shield, it seems that photocrinch has hit the nail on the head. In other words it's because it takes too long to ready a bow if one has a shield on one's arm (or too lone to ready a shield if one has a bow in hand). |
| Patrick R | 19 Aug 2017 2:18 p.m. PST |
|
| Tango01 | 19 Aug 2017 10:52 p.m. PST |
But in the Middle Agest the archers wore no shields … have you seen the recent Battle of Games of Thrones?… (smile)
Amicalement
Armand
|
| Lion in the Stars | 21 Aug 2017 11:02 p.m. PST |
Up until the Mongol Invasions (1274), war was mostly between nobles (and their retainers), and they were almost all horse archers. Foot archers usually fought behind pavises. It wasn't until the Mongols showed what massed bows could do that the Japanese started massing foot archers, and even then using a bow takes a lot of practice. |
| CAPTAIN BEEFHEART | 06 Sep 2017 3:08 a.m. PST |
Europe pretty much dropped the shield when better armor arrived. Also, they, like the Japanese often needed 2 hands for their main weapons. |
|
