"Hind Commander or Hind and Seek??" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Aviation Discussion (1946-2007) Message Board Back to the WWII Land Gallery Message Board Back to the WWII Discussion Message Board Back to the 20mm WWII Message Board Back to the Cold War (1946-1989) Message Board
|
| Todd636 | 13 Aug 2017 11:01 a.m. PST |
Anyone have experience with both? Aspect of both interest me. HC covers more nations, but doesn't seem to have any support. Post seem to be 5+ years old. Like aspects of H&S but seems to be limited to the Soviet/Afghanistan conflict. More current and looks like there would be support.
Is HC more of an air game with land support and H&S more of a land game with air support?
Ideally, I would like to use 3mm or 6mm figures which doesn't seem to be an issue with either.
Opinions/thoughts? |
LeonAdler  | 13 Aug 2017 11:01 a.m. PST |
The new PSC Sdkfz 233. Tend not to go for a lot of weathering but for German kit in North Africa seems appropiate. Various of the stumel cew figures added.
L |
| LeonAdler | 13 Aug 2017 11:03 a.m. PST |
Oh heck this bug is sooooooooooooooooooo annoying
L |
| Dobber | 17 Apr 2018 8:59 a.m. PST |
OP,
You are correct when you say that hind Commander is more of an air game with ground support. It's thing is that it focuses on helicopters. Hind and seek is in fact a ground game with air support. The air assets are pretty much just flying tanks with an altitude button. That's not a bad thing it works out pretty well. However its system is pretty linked with the Soviet Afghanistan war it might make a good bases for a Vietnam game but I don't see it getting too much further than that maybe just my opinion though. I would say the type of game you want would pick the rules for you. |
|
