Help support TMP


"The Conduct of the Militia at Tippecanoe: Elihu..." Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

In order to respect possible copyright issues, when quoting from a book or article, please quote no more than three paragraphs.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the War of 1812 Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Drums & Shakos: Large Battles


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


Featured Workbench Article

Napoleonic Dragoons from Perry Miniatures

Warcolours Painting Studio Fezian paints "the best plastic sculpts I have seen so far..."


Featured Profile Article

The Gates of Old Jerusalem

The gates of Old Jerusalem offer a wide variety of scenario possibilities.


936 hits since 10 Aug 2017
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP11 Aug 2017 10:32 a.m. PST

… Stout's Controversy with Colonel John P. Boyd, January, 1812

"The forces commanded by Governor William Henry Harrison at the battle of Tippecanoe in November, 1811, were composed of Indiana militia, Kentucky volunteers, and regular army units. In the months that followed, a controversy over the relative merits of the militia and the regulars was waged in the columns of the VincennesWestern Sun, edited by Elihu Stout. The dispute culminated in an attempt by Colonel John P. Boyd, second in command at Tippecanoe and commander of the principal regular force, the Fourth United States Infantry Regiment, to do personal injury to the editor. Boyd had been offended by editorial remarks directed at him by Stout.

Actually the whole quarrel was only a segment of a much older political struggle in Indiana Territory between Harrison's supporters and opponents. The controversy first attracted public attention in the second session of the third general assembly in November and December, 1811. Here Harrison's opponents seemed determined to praise the conduct of units commanded by Boyd and Colonels Luke Decker and Joseph Bartholomew in an effort to embarrass the commander-in-chief. Harrison felt impelled to reply to a house resolution which he felt had slighted the role of the volunteers; his message was a forceful defense of the militia. In this dispute, as on most other questions of his administration, Harrison had the backing of Stout and the Western Sun. The following documents comprise the core of the Stout-Boyd controversy as it developed in January, 1812…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.