/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory [TMP] "The Conduct of the Militia at Tippecanoe: Elihu..." Topic

 Help support TMP


"The Conduct of the Militia at Tippecanoe: Elihu..." Topic


1 Post

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please remember that some of our members are children, and act appropriately.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the War of 1812 Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic
19th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Recent Link


Featured Ruleset

Rank & File


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

The Amazing Worlds of Grenadier

The fascinating history of one of the hobby's major manufacturers.


Featured Workbench Article

From Fish Tank to Tabletop

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian receives a gift from his wife…


Featured Profile Article

First Look: Barrage's 28mm Roads

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian takes a look at flexible roads made from long-lasting flexible resin.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


949 hits since 10 Aug 2017
©1994-2026 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango0111 Aug 2017 10:32 a.m. PST

… Stout's Controversy with Colonel John P. Boyd, January, 1812

"The forces commanded by Governor William Henry Harrison at the battle of Tippecanoe in November, 1811, were composed of Indiana militia, Kentucky volunteers, and regular army units. In the months that followed, a controversy over the relative merits of the militia and the regulars was waged in the columns of the VincennesWestern Sun, edited by Elihu Stout. The dispute culminated in an attempt by Colonel John P. Boyd, second in command at Tippecanoe and commander of the principal regular force, the Fourth United States Infantry Regiment, to do personal injury to the editor. Boyd had been offended by editorial remarks directed at him by Stout.

Actually the whole quarrel was only a segment of a much older political struggle in Indiana Territory between Harrison's supporters and opponents. The controversy first attracted public attention in the second session of the third general assembly in November and December, 1811. Here Harrison's opponents seemed determined to praise the conduct of units commanded by Boyd and Colonels Luke Decker and Joseph Bartholomew in an effort to embarrass the commander-in-chief. Harrison felt impelled to reply to a house resolution which he felt had slighted the role of the volunteers; his message was a forceful defense of the militia. In this dispute, as on most other questions of his administration, Harrison had the backing of Stout and the Western Sun. The following documents comprise the core of the Stout-Boyd controversy as it developed in January, 1812…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.