Help support TMP


"Worst Depiction of the Revolution" Topic


74 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the American Revolution Message Board


Action Log

23 May 2019 1:39 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

18th Century

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset

Warfare in the Age of Reason


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

1:700 Black Seas British Brigs

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian paints brigs for the British fleet.


3,457 hits since 8 Aug 2017
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Pages: 1 2 

nevinsrip04 Sep 2017 10:27 a.m. PST

The Patriot is a 2000 American epic historical fiction war film.

Did you see the word FICTION????????

"I know of lots of people, who think that movie represents history,"

So what? You know a lot of "misinformed" people.
Perhaps you can explain the word FICTION to them.

42flanker04 Sep 2017 10:33 a.m. PST

The subject doesn't vex me. It's the stupidity of people who try to compare a movie to real life.

Fair enough but why do you equate that with discussing films notable for woeful historical innaccuracy?

Historical accuracy seems to be a fundamental theme of the forum.

nevinsrip04 Sep 2017 12:03 p.m. PST

"Historical accuracy seems to be a fundamental theme of the forum."

True enough.
But movies are not.

They were not meant to be and they never will. They are entertainment, not serious historical lessons.
It strikes me as ridiculous, that a very tiny segment (wargamers) of the population, think that just because they are offended by historical inaccuracies that a movie is "bad".
Especially a movie that has a big bold disclaimer that says :
"This is a work of FICTION."

If you don't like the script or actors or whatever, that's perfectly fine. Don't watch it. But to condemn a movie because of historical inaccuracies is silly. It's fiction, not reality.

In a country where more than half the population can't name the Vice President, do you really think that it matters to anyone but
a few disgruntled wargamers?
And do you really think that anyone in Hollywood cares?

Winston Smith04 Sep 2017 12:37 p.m. PST

The purpose of a movie is that of any product. The purpose of a car is to make money for the manufacturer.

Anyone looking for truth in a movie should stick to art house stuff where you wear a beret while smoking stinky cigarettes.

Occasionally a movie gets it right. Hallelujah!

I watched Bridge of Spies yesterday on tv. Quite a few times I exclaimed "I didn't know that!" I enjoyed it immensely for the period flavor. I swear it made feel colder than Band of Brothers or Game of Thrones, so much that my nose ran from the cold.
After it was over I fact checked. Darned if they didn't get a lot of it right!

Did you ever notice the disclaimer "Based on a true story"? That's a very flexible disclaimer.

Winston Smith04 Sep 2017 12:46 p.m. PST

Has there ever been a period when we could count on Hollywood for accuracy?
I remember watching the 70 year old Northwest Passage on tv. "My goodness, those are interesting uniforms for the Rangers!"
When production was completed, I bet the uniforms went back to one of the many clothing rental companies in Hollywood where they appeared in many more movies.

History is the background for a script. It's even better than a novel, since you don't have to pay an author royalties!

nevinsrip04 Sep 2017 7:53 p.m. PST

Word up, John.

Gunfreak Supporting Member of TMP05 Sep 2017 3:01 a.m. PST

Did you see the word FICTION????????

Did you see the word HISTORICAL?

42flanker05 Sep 2017 5:26 a.m. PST

Man, you are certainly being grumpy about this, Nevinsrip.

I guess somebody should create an internet forum where disgruntled wargamers can air and share their…oh, wait!

Virginia Tory05 Sep 2017 5:30 a.m. PST

The issue is you can be historically accurate and do a great film. The errors in Lethal Musket are pretty egregious, which killed it for me.

Sweet Liberty is better and mocks just about every silly plot device in Lethal Musket.

nevinsrip05 Sep 2017 9:24 a.m. PST

Man, you are certainly being grumpy about this, Nevinsrip.

According to who?
You?

Typical. When you can't win with facts, go for name calling.

nevinsrip05 Sep 2017 10:01 a.m. PST

"Did you see the word HISTORICAL?"

John, jump in here and explain to Mr Gunfreak modifiers and objects
in sentences.

42flanker07 Sep 2017 3:27 a.m. PST

According to who?
You?

Yes, of course Me! Who else?

Typical. When you can't win with facts, go for name calling.


'Typical'? Not of me, I think you'll find, but I rest my case. Grumpy, grumpy, grumpy. Fact. Incontrovertable.

Winston Smith07 Sep 2017 6:53 a.m. PST

Glad to find another fan of Sweet Liberty.
Interesting anecdote about that. I was talking to a group of reenactors after the movie came out. They were extras in the movie. They HATED it because of the liberties it took with "the facts". Apparently no pole vaulting was involved in the "real battle".
I think they missed the point. The movie was ABOUT how Hollywood doesn't care.
Michael Caine playing the actor who played Tarleton was particularly funny. He was convinced that since he always played the Good Guy that Ban would never do that!

As I have been saying for years here, wargamers are not the target audience for "historical" movies.
I wonder if Homer had a bunch of pedants bitching that Dawn didn't really have rosy fingers, or that Aias wasn't really that tall.

nevinsrip07 Sep 2017 10:32 a.m. PST

Flanker, Is that a personal attack from you?

If I was really grumpy, I would hit the complaint button.

42flanker08 Sep 2017 3:02 a.m. PST

if Homer had a bunch of pedants bitching that Dawn didn't really have rosy fingers, or that Aias wasn't really that tall.

Well, personally I would like clarification as to in what way the sea was 'wine dark…'

42flanker08 Sep 2017 3:05 a.m. PST

Nevinsrip, it's an observation based on first person experience.

Round these parts that's been known to count as fact.

nevinsrip08 Sep 2017 11:30 a.m. PST

"Round these parts that's been known to count as fact."

Yes, I'm sure you're the last word on everything in your house.
Good for you.

dBerczerk08 Sep 2017 12:17 p.m. PST

In the AMC series "Turn" my favorite performance was by Angus Macfadyn as Robert Rogers.

huron725 Supporting Member of TMP09 Sep 2017 6:26 a.m. PST

I like anything that has to do with AWI. I don't know a huge amount of history as some on here but I do certainly take anything from a hollywood movie with a grain of salt or two or three…

42flanker09 Sep 2017 10:31 a.m. PST

Yes, I'm sure you're the last word on everything in your house.
Good for you.

Well, nevins, I envy you your certainty on the matter, although I'm not quite sure what bearing it has on this discussion, but, thanks.

Virginia Tory12 Sep 2017 12:44 p.m. PST

"He was convinced that since he always played the Good Guy that Ban would never do that!"

That was an awesome scene…"Oh, no, no. He was a British officer…"

Old Contemptibles12 Sep 2017 7:30 p.m. PST

I still maintain that you can be historically more accurate and still be entertaining and make money. It is just as easy to do it right than it is doing it wrong. A film or a book or any other media can never be 100% accurate.

But some movies do a much better job of being historically accurate. If your standard is 100% then no movies are accurate.

You can nitpick any movie to pieces.Sometimes the entertainment value can over come the inaccuracies like in Braveheart or they can't like in The Patriot. But historical accuracy and entrainment are not mutually exclusive.

Dave Crowell16 Sep 2017 7:30 p.m. PST

For me Turn was entertaining, The Patriot was painful. Neither because of its take on the AWI. I think Patriot is just generally bad.

Last of the Mohicans is pretty bad history. Both versions are good entertainment though.

Winston Smith16 Sep 2017 8:25 p.m. PST

In the "Promontory" penultimate sequence, Last of the Mohicans has arguably the finest blending of action and music ever presented on the Silver Screen. I will forgive anything for that.

Pages: 1 2 

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.