2. Lord Lucan (divisional commander)
3. Lord Cardigan (brigade commander)
it is not well understood that the Heavy Brigade started to charge ….
Yet it was now that Lucan – concluding that the Light Brigade would be wiped out before they reached the Russians at the end of the valley — ordered the Heavy Brigade to halt their advance and retire, leaving Cardigan's men without support. Turning to Lord Paulet, he justified his action and his desire to preserve at least half of his cavalry division, "They have sacrificed the Light Brigade; they shall not have the Heavy, if I can help it."
When the brigade charged into the valley it found itself surrounded on three sides by the Russian guns, with devastating results.
The letter written by Lieutenant Frederick Maxse, who was serving on Lord Raglan's staff, said the widespread feeling among the surviving men was that a 36-year-old officer called Captain Louis Nolan was to blame.
Capt Nolan was the messenger who conveyed Lord Raglan's written orders to Lord Lucan, instructing him to "follow the enemy and try to prevent the enemy from carrying away the guns".
However, Prof Saul David, who has studied Lieut Maxse's account, says Capt Nolan – who had served in India and saw himself as a military tactician – over-egged Lord Raglan's orders.
Addressing Lord Lucan, Capt Nolan gestured towards the Russian forces and said: "There, my lord, is your enemy! There are your guns!" Capt Nolan demanded to be allowed to join the charge being led by Lord Cardigan on Oct 25, 1854, but was one of the first to fall when shrapnel from an exploding shell pierced his chest as he galloped to the front of the Light Brigade's assault.
Captain Louis Nolan, who misinterpreted or exaggerated Lord Raglan's orders
Lieut Maxse wrote: "On looking to the left, saw poor Nolan lying dead who 10 minutes before I had seen eager & full of life, galloping down to Lord Lucan, anxious & determined to make him do something with the cavalry (of which he is a member)."
He records Capt Nolan's apparent resentment at the behaviour of the cavalry until then. "He was always very indignant at the little they had done in this campaign & bitter against Lord L," he wrote.
"All the cavalry lay this disastrous charge on his soldiers & say that he left no option to Lord L to whom they say his tone was almost taunting on delivering the message – if he was to blame he has paid the penalty."
A second staff officer, Nigel Kingscoteé, confirmed the view that Capt Nolan was to blame for the disaster, later telling Raglan's son that he "would no doubt have been broke by court martial" had he lived.
Prof David, who teaches military history at the University of Buckingham, said all three key figures bore some responsibility but posterity would reserve its sternest judgment for Capt Nolan.
"So contemptuous was he of Lucan's ability, so desperate for the cavalry to show its worth, that he failed in the one essential task of a staff galloper: to provide the officer in receipt of the message with the necessary clarification," he writes in the latest edition of BBC History Magazine.
"It seems, moreover, that he used the word 'attack' when Raglan had intended a mere show of force. If so, Nolan bears the chief responsibility for what followed
ALL that said, only Nolan was killed -- neatly removing his testimony from the record and allowing all blame to fall on him….giving new meaning to the adage: shoot the messenger.