Help support TMP


"Star Wars: The Last Jedi’ Theories: The Good, The Bad, " Topic


7 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please be courteous toward your fellow TMP members.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Star Wars Message Board


Areas of Interest

Science Fiction

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

6mm Ratel Medium Tank

Medium tanks for my psychic overlord army.


Featured Workbench Article

Armored Windshields

Cracked windshield? No problem – just armor it!


Featured Profile Article

Plastic Skulls

Need skulls for your battlefield?


Current Poll


990 hits since 28 Jun 2017
©1994-2025 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP28 Jun 2017 12:59 p.m. PST

…and The Ugly,

"Lucasfilm likes to keep fans dangling when it comes to Star Wars, especially the core films in the Skywalker Saga. The Force Awakens marketing campaign kept the biggest takeaways close to the vest — not even journalists were allowed to screen the film for the domestic press junket — and a similar bare bones-style lead-in is happening with The Last Jedi. Opening this December, the film's first trailer came out in April, and since then we've seen a photo spread in Vanity Fair with little else. This leaves lots of room for speculation.

One of the earliest reports I can remember of The Force Awakens was the alleged script that saw Luke Skywalker's lightsaber, grasped by his severed hand, floating through space and landing on a desert planet. That obviously was not in the film, but the theories and claims the online maelstrom spit forth ranged from pretty plausible to totally outrageous. Now we're here, approaching the release of The Last Jedi, and once again sifting through all the hot takes, reports, alleged leaks, and clues left from the previews.

Here are some of the most plausible and most farfetched theories for Star Wars: The Last Jedi…"
Main page
link


Amicalement
Armand

StarfuryXL528 Jun 2017 6:50 p.m. PST

Uh, oh … cue Captain Gideon.

Captain Gideon28 Jun 2017 7:01 p.m. PST

To be clear one more time Jar Jar Binks is NOT a sith lord.

Landorl29 Jun 2017 8:29 a.m. PST

I mean, why else would Lucas put such a ghastly character in there if he isn't evil?

Maybe Lucas is the Sith Lord. He turned to the dark side after the original three. He turned Vader into a hero. He introduced Binks, and he made the movie Phantom Menace. He corrupted the whole Star Wars Universe!

Captain Gideon29 Jun 2017 9:08 a.m. PST

Vocisuferous I've seen it and I DON'T buy it.

Also he's NOT a ghastly character.

And Landori I disagree with what you said.

Captain Gideon29 Jun 2017 11:08 a.m. PST

Vocisuferous it's a load of BS and I don't have to read it/look at it again once is ENOUGH.

And you're right it's your opinion but I do disagree with everything you said,but again it's your opinion.

robert piepenbrink Supporting Member of TMP29 Jun 2017 1:02 p.m. PST

I think the ratio of pre-movie discussion to movies worth seeing has gotten pretty far out of whack.

In fact, right now I'd settle for having the movie-makers pay as much attention to the script as they do to the publicity. Lots of publicity will not save a movie. Plot, characterization and dialogue may.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.