"Improving the Campaign System – an assessment. " Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ancients Scenarios Message Board
Areas of InterestAncients
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| timurilank | 28 Jun 2017 7:07 a.m. PST |
This experiment with army size differences has proven useful. I will continue these experiments using other armies including a few medieval ones over the next few months. I have posted an initial assessment to the blog.
link Cheers,
Robert |
| goragrad | 28 Jun 2017 2:54 p.m. PST |
And here is the ink to those battle AARs - link That single pip die with a larger number of elements definitely evens the odds. |
| timurilank | 28 Jun 2017 3:07 p.m. PST |
The latest experiments have been between the Gallic and Polybian Roman; a standard 12 element force versus 20 for the barbarian. A few things were very clear, a passive Roman general is inviting a disaster while an aggressive commander can produce results you would only read about in the history books. Report with photos will follow in a few days. |
| goragrad | 29 Jun 2017 9:57 a.m. PST |
|
|
