/mivacommon/member/pass.mv: Line 148: MvEXPORT: Runtime Error: Error writing to 'readers/pass_err.log': No such file or directory
|  "Improving the Campaign System – fighting against odds." Topic
 3 PostsAll members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page. Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi. For more information, see the TMP FAQ. 
 Back to the Ancients Scenarios Message Board 
 Areas of InterestAncients
 
 Featured Hobby News Article
 Featured Link
 Top-Rated Ruleset
 Featured Showcase Article Remember back in 2005, when I promised pictures of those Sumerian chariot stands in 6mm?
 Featured Workbench Article The Army for Bill was a collective project in which TMP'ers came together to jointly paint an Ancients army for yours truly.
 Featured Profile Article Wargame groundcloths as seen at Bayou Wars.
 Featured Book Review
 | 
|  timurilank  | 27 Jun 2017 2:21 a.m. PST |  | 
  
  Using the standard  DBA 12 element per side game some battles fall short of the image we have of large armies facing smaller disciplined forces. The Battle of Gaugamela comes to mind as we expect vast numbers of Persians should be fighting smaller Macedonian army.  In the recent campaigns set in the 4th and 5th century AD I had an opportunity to experiment with disproportionate size armies without resorting to vast numbers of figures.  Here are three games with large numbers of German barbarians face a smaller Roman army. link
 Next post will cover an assessment of the tests. Cheers,
 Robert
 |  | advocate | 27 Jun 2017 4:56 a.m. PST |  | 
  
  Several years ago I ran a campaign in which armies could be from 12 to 24 elements, but always operated with one command dice. While larger armies definitely had the advantage, it was happened on a few occasions that 15 bases would defeat 24. |  |  timurilank  | 27 Jun 2017 5:38 a.m. PST |  | 
  
  Advocate,That is a nice feeling when it happens.
 In this case, the distribution of losses needed for a smaller sub-tribe to demoralize demonstrates the fragility of the confederations created to battle Rome.  Despite the two Roman victories, they were one element away from breaking which shows how close the games were. |  |