"Ford class supercarrier cost overruns" Topic
5 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Ultramodern Warfare (2014-present) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article We're back to stump you again with three more figures!
Featured Workbench Article Here's Suzi - before and after...
Featured Profile Article
Current Poll
Featured Movie Review
|
The Membership System will be closing for maintenance in 11 minutes. Please finish anything that will involve the membership system, including membership changes or posting of messages.
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 08 Jun 2017 4:21 p.m. PST |
Too late to back out now. Too much has been invested already. Have to forge on and hope they can get a handle on the cost overruns. Who am I kidding here? link |
| Winston Smith | 08 Jun 2017 5:33 p.m. PST |
Too big to fail?  |
| Outlaw Tor | 09 Jun 2017 7:54 a.m. PST |
Same article played on various sites with same error, even, "Nimitz's A4B reactors", not, they are A4W's in the Nimitz class. |
| 15mm and 28mm Fanatik | 09 Jun 2017 9:40 a.m. PST |
Too big to fail? Quite so. It would appear the Military-Industrial-Congressional Complex has learned its lessons well. Expect all future such programs (F-35, Ford class carriers, etc.) to hold taxpayers hostage in similar fashion. |
| Lion in the Stars | 11 Jun 2017 10:33 p.m. PST |
First-in-class always has a lot of overruns coming from "well, crap that didn't work right, gotta tear it apart and rebuild it!" It's even more pronounced here because of new reactors, catapults, and arresting gear. |
|
explores another variant in the European Buildings range.