"General D'Armee - further thoughts/impressions " Topic
8 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please avoid recent politics on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Napoleonic Battle Reports Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article
|
| Sgt Steiner | 30 May 2017 3:00 p.m. PST |
Hi A face to face game using rules today (be warned fairly windy prose) link
|
| JMcCarroll | 30 May 2017 3:42 p.m. PST |
|
| Madmac64 | 30 May 2017 4:10 p.m. PST |
|
| seldonH | 30 May 2017 8:27 p.m. PST |
Thanks for posting, good report with nice analysis. Francisco |
| Marc at work | 31 May 2017 5:45 a.m. PST |
Good commentary there about how you felt it worked, and your "answers" to the perceived issues for your table size. The use of "ADCs" will probably allow the early battles to exploit the French strengths, so it may well be fun to get the balance of forces right |
| John de Terre Neuve | 31 May 2017 6:54 a.m. PST |
Very nice report, quite enjoyed it. Nice terrain and figures. John |
| adymac2650 | 01 Jun 2017 9:18 a.m. PST |
Great report as usual, interested in you views re GdA and Over the Hills |
| roundie | 23 Jun 2017 5:54 p.m. PST |
Great report. One way to address the AdC 4v6 discrepancy may be to use the C-in-C ability rules eg make the French commander Incomparable (+1 AdC) or make the Russian Commissariat (-1 AdC for over 5 brigades) regards
Roundie |
|
builds a cutter and a corsair, both in 1/1200 scale.
