Help support TMP


"Mithridates' Heavy Cavalry" Topic


10 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please do not post offers to buy and sell on the main forum.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Ancients Discussion Message Board


Action Log

16 Dec 2017 11:02 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from TMP Poll Suggestions board

Areas of Interest

Ancients

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Top-Rated Ruleset

Armati


Rating: gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star gold star 


Featured Showcase Article

Bronze Age's Ajax, King of Salamis

combatpainter Fezian paints a legend from the Trojan Wars.


Featured Workbench Article

Painting a 15mm Tibetan DBA Army: The Infantry

wodger Fezian begins his series on how to paint a 15mm DBA army well, in a reasonable time frame.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Current Poll


1,721 hits since 23 May 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian23 May 2017 3:33 p.m. PST

Peter Andrews, in Slingshot 310, wrote an article pondering the nature of Mithridates' heavy cavalry. Which possibility do you favor?

* lance-armed companion cavalry of Alexander and his Successors
* Persian-style horsemen with javelin
* Sarmatian-style cavalry
* Armenian-style cataphracts
etc.

JMcCarroll23 May 2017 3:55 p.m. PST

A mix of some or all?

evilgong23 May 2017 5:29 p.m. PST

I'm not sure if successor xystophori (sp) lancers would be still about, the rest would probably appear in his army in some way.

wrgmr123 May 2017 7:03 p.m. PST

Evilgong is correct, no successors but the other three in some form or another.

basileus6623 May 2017 10:15 p.m. PST

I think that the answer should be: it depends. Mithridates was fighting Rome from almost 20 years. His armies would have field different types of heavy cavalry, according circumstances. At the height of his power it is reasonable to think that his armies would have included heavier armored types, as those were usually aristocrats and it is probable that they would have been willing to support Mithridates when he looked like he could actually defeat Rome and consolidate his conquests in Anatolia and Greece.

The Last Conformist23 May 2017 10:47 p.m. PST

Sarmatian-style cavalry was surely provided by his Bosporan domains; similarly Armenian cataphracts by his Armenian allies. But what Peter tried to establish was the nature of the nature of the heavy cavalry of Pontus itself.

Phillius Sponsoring Member of TMP24 May 2017 1:58 a.m. PST

My Pontic Nobles are a mixture of Greek and Persian types of horsemen on Persian style horses, some with frontal armour.
I use Tin Soldier 25mm.

Khusrau27 May 2017 6:11 p.m. PST

Sarmatian or Parthian Style.

Swampster28 May 2017 4:00 a.m. PST

Same as the Kappadokians. Whatever they looked like.

French Wargame Holidays03 Jun 2017 7:14 a.m. PST

I have Bosphorian, Greek and Armenian, all look very different to each other.

Cheers
Matt

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.