"Defence Policy Defend or Conter attack" Topic
4 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please do not use bad language on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Modern Discussion (1946 to 2013) Message Board
Areas of InterestModern
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article You can pick up a toy blimp in the local toy department for less than a dollar.
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Ammunition Hill was the most fortified Jordanian position that the Israelis faced in 1967.
Current Poll
Featured Book Review
|
| UshCha | 20 May 2017 7:06 a.m. PST |
This is a re post as the last thread seemed to vanish for no reason. As a matter of policy if all else is equal an you have a reasonable choice would you chose to counter attack cutting enemy off from his logistics links or do you re-enforce the defenses and stop the attach at the front. I have recently been been in a game where these were the options. I chose to defend but mainly perhaps I did not consider the alternatives. So is there a definite preferred policy if the options are there. A bit like the Russian re-enforce winners not losers. |
 Extra Crispy  | 20 May 2017 9:10 a.m. PST |
Not sure I could decide this in a vacuum. |
| awalesII | 20 May 2017 10:27 a.m. PST |
"So is there a definite preferred policy" Have to know the variables. |
| Dwindling Gravitas | 20 May 2017 1:19 p.m. PST |
I vote counter-attack, if at all viable. |
|
explains step-by-step how he painted 