Help support TMP


"First Game of The Men Who Would Be Kings" Topic


12 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Victorian Colonial Board Message Board

Back to the 19th Century Battle Reports Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board



1,017 hits since 16 May 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

RobSmith Inactive Member16 May 2017 8:33 a.m. PST

I've posted a battle report and photos to the Wargame Spot blog at wp.me/p8suO4-fp .

I've also started a discussion on the forum at link

Boxers!

Ragbones Supporting Member of TMP16 May 2017 6:31 p.m. PST

Great AAR. thumbs up I plan on using TMWWBK for a 55 Days in Peking game this summer.

Oh Bugger Inactive Member17 May 2017 6:22 a.m. PST

Nice game, I do think TMWWBK has a lot to offer. I'm also remembering I have a bunch of allied and Chinese regulars and some mongol cavalry still in the bags. They might get painted now and used for TMWWBK.

RobSmith Inactive Member17 May 2017 9:16 a.m. PST

Yes. I like The Sword and the Flame OK, but TMWWBK does seem to play more quickly. It also seems to work well as a multi-player game.

Personal logo piper909 Supporting Member of TMP17 May 2017 12:04 p.m. PST

Posted my rough army inventory to the forum; hope to join in on this sometime this summer! Am ordering a copy of the rules today to get ready.

clifblkskull Supporting Member of TMP17 May 2017 9:06 p.m. PST

Nice AAR
Thanks for posting
Clif

cae5ar14 Jun 2017 4:20 p.m. PST

Do these rules cover the Napoleonic period?

Early morning writer14 Jun 2017 10:50 p.m. PST

Um, why would colonial rules cover the Napoleonic period? Odd.

Own the rules, and no, they don't. But you could adapt them to just about anything – I think someone is using them for FIW.

Other than the hands full of dice (8-16, blech!), very useful set of rules with many good ideas in them.

pilum40 Supporting Member of TMP22 Jun 2017 5:05 p.m. PST

I'm also using these rules for a 54mm AWI game "Along the King's Road-Back to Boston". I'm using Mr. Babbage as the Patriot commander and human players as the British. Your thoughts? I've had a blast putting games on using "Playing Mr. Babbage" with multiple players.

Early morning writer22 Jun 2017 5:59 p.m. PST

Drive that pilum forward. These rules – though I've yet to play them – seem highly versatile. I think in time, perhaps a fairly short time, these rules will supplant TSATF (except for a very few die hards who will refuse to convert). And they seem highly adaptable to any period with firing weapons – though perhaps they might break with mechanical devices. So, go forward and report back on your efforts.

Bindon Blood28 Jun 2017 3:10 a.m. PST

There is an article in an issue of WI on using one of the Rampant rulesets for Napolonics. Cn't remember which one though…

cae5ar28 Jun 2017 5:00 a.m. PST

Yes, it is a bit of an odd question, I'll admit… Until you consider that there is a Lion Rampant variant for fantasy, medieval, renaissance and colonial, with a gaping hole where Napoleonics should be. I just thought the colonial set might be flexed backwards to suit.

I've also heard of the WI issue on "Eagle Rampant". I wish I could get my hands on a copy or find an official version of these great rules for Napoleonics.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.