Help support TMP


"What about cavalry skirmishers?" Topic


17 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

Napoleonic

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Showcase Article


Featured Profile Article

Report from Bayou Wars 2006

The Editor heads for Vicksburg...


1,200 hits since 12 May 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Zardoz

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Tango0112 May 2017 2:52 p.m. PST

"…But what about cavalry skirmishers? Not sure if I have ever seen this represented on any table but if the campaign stage of a game is missing, it would be fun to have this element introduced. Again in a limited way. The role of the umpire might become necessary to make this work. For example, if there are hidden forces in a wood or behind a hill, you would not send a whole regiment of cavalry to recce the area, but perhaps just a token force. This could be represented by 2 figures on a base, who can move further than other cavalry units, but have no offensive role. Would retire on contact with any formed unit and would stand off against any enemy cavalry skirmish stand, so would be almost impossible to wipe out. I appreciate they had their carbine, but enabling this token force to score disorders or hits, would make them too important. Their role would be to scout areas of the battlefield for hidden enemy units only. Perhaps just 2 bases per side…"

link

link

Main page
napoleonics.blogspot.com.ar


Amicalement
Armand

Rittmester13 May 2017 2:54 a.m. PST

Cav skirmishers would be a great expansion for the light cav and dragoons in 28mm. A plastic sprue w different distinctive and generic torsoes, such as hussars, coupled w firing and loading arms could make most plastic sets very versatile.
Could be used for aggregated rules as well as skirmish rules.

Personal logo Whirlwind Supporting Member of TMP13 May 2017 7:08 a.m. PST

Neil Thomas "simplicity in Practice" rules use cavalry skirmishers (or at least, cavalry firing) – quite a bold call, since the rules are very stripped down in other ways.

IIRC, some of the 80s rules did – perhaps Newbury allowed it?

steamingdave4713 May 2017 7:42 a.m. PST

There is an option in "Over the Hills" to use cavalry skirmishers.

Tango0113 May 2017 10:54 a.m. PST

Thanks for the info!…


Amicalement
Armand

14Bore13 May 2017 1:04 p.m. PST

Empire III has rules for them, and I think every line cavalry regiment of my Prussians has them on the books.

Lord Hill13 May 2017 3:01 p.m. PST

I've made mounted French dragoon skirmishers – just use the firing arms which are supposed to be for the foot dragoons.

Three Armies14 May 2017 2:18 a.m. PST

I seem to remember reading some accounts of French cavalry receiving a charge halted and firing carbines from the saddle! I think this was in 1809 ???

Personal logo deadhead Supporting Member of TMP14 May 2017 7:59 a.m. PST

Not a good idea…..asking for trouble. I wonder how they got on…

14Bore14 May 2017 8:51 a.m. PST

Stange unit I have are a company of foot jagers in a Hobe's Prussian cavalry brigade. I have used them and they mostly just try to stay out of the way in a protected space.

Tango0114 May 2017 3:04 p.m. PST

There were a lot of accounts about Cavalry charges halted by the fire of other cavalry unit with their carbines… but also many more not halted… (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Three Armies15 May 2017 2:59 a.m. PST

Deadhead I seem to remember the account suggesting that they won the encounter resoundingly! Also of note was that it was in the same time as a regiment of French Carribiniers were cleared from the field by a unit of Austrian Hussars! You try doing that on a wargames table lol.

Jabba Miles15 May 2017 4:38 a.m. PST

@Three Armies maybe this, Battle of Sahagun 1808.

"The French cavalry became aware of the proximity of the British cavalry and exited from the town to the east unmolested. In the dawn light the French regiments, catching sight of the 15th Hussars to the south, formed up in two lines with the 1st Provisional Chasseurs (commanded by Colonel Tascher, a relative of the Empress Josephine – though he may not have been present) in front and the 8th Dragoons behind them. Unusually, the French cavalry received the charge of the British hussars whilst stationary and tried to halt it with carbine fire"

from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Sahag%C3%BAn

Allan F Mountford15 May 2017 6:02 a.m. PST

'Napoleonic Warfare' (1st through 4th editions) by Newbury Rules and '1685-1845' by WRG both included cavalry skirmishers.

The WRG 1685-1845 Yahoo group is here:

link

The site is geared towards the Napoleonic period. It includes play sheets incorporating minor modifications introduced by the Stoke Wargames Group over the last 35 years or so.

The key to the rules is the move sequence. The sequence as printed is too loose, so one of our members, Phil Callcott, drafted a quick reference sheet including all the reaction tables set out in the required sequence. Deviating from the sequence gets you into all sorts of trouble since the alternate move sequence falls apart if you don't follow it properly.

- Allan (Group Moderator)

Personal logo McLaddie Supporting Member of TMP15 May 2017 9:32 a.m. PST

Three Armies

I seem to remember reading some accounts of French cavalry receiving a charge halted and firing carbines from the saddle! I think this was in 1809 ???

Deadhead:
q>Not a good idea…..asking for trouble. I wonder how they got on…

It was done, sometimes without firing carbines [I know of three accounts of Carabiniers and Cuirassiers standing to take a charge, two successful, one not]

It was done because
1. It could work,
2. The circumstances made the tactic more attractive,and
3. It was unexpected, which had a power all its own.

But I lay it down for a Maxim, That Troops behave well till they come to what they believe is the Point of Decision. If after that, Things should be carried beyond their Imagination, they will despond… Imaginary Hopes and Fears are stronger than the Reality…. There is no Profession where the Study of Human-nature is more necessary than ours.
—Sir James Young, Essay on the Command of Small Detachments, 1766

Read 'imagination' as beyond 'expectations.' Young gives as an example troops in a trenchline charging attackers with the bayonet instead of firing--as expected.

Musketier15 May 2017 1:29 p.m. PST

This is a pet peeve of mine I'm afraid: With the laudable exception of Perry AWI British light dragoons, there seem to be hardly any suitable figures, when light cavalry and even dragoons would have spent far more time in this sort of engagement than in massed charges. Perhaps the latest fashion for skirmish gaming can bring a change here?

Mick the Metalsmith15 May 2017 2:09 p.m. PST

From what I understand, cavalry skirmishing was often as much small groups of horsemen making small "charges" as much as sniping. This could discomfit infantry skirmishes or force formation changes and halts. So even saber armed skirmishers figs would not be out of character.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.