Help support TMP


"Who's Staff would you have liked to be on?" Topic


29 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please avoid recent politics on the forums.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

1:72nd IMEX Union Artillery

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian adds artillery to his soft-plastic Union forces.


Featured Profile Article

Editor Julia's 2015 Christmas Project

Editor Julia would like your support for a special project.


Current Poll


Featured Book Review


999 hits since 6 May 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?


TMP logo

Membership

Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
Trajanus06 May 2017 7:35 a.m. PST

Just a thought that came to me in an idle moment. If you had been around at the time which General's staff would you like to have been a member of?

OK some times a dangerous and uncomfortable job but if you lived through it all plenty of material for a book or two after the war!

Now Grant, Lee and Meade, well maybe too obvious but if you stick to Corps commanders on either side, or maybe Divisional ones you get to meet the great and the good while seeing history made first hand. You might even get to be involved in a little yourself!

I've given it some thought and both my Union and Confederate choices are a little crazy.

For the Union it would have to be Sheridan. You get to see plenty of the war, go on some wild rides with some real lively people and be present a major events. Of course you have to stay on the right side of Little Phil but as he is never wrong that's not going to be hard. Is it? :o)

For the Confederacy not so sure.

Jackson, I would have to shoot on religious grounds (he was, I'm not). Lee like I said, too obvious, although The Peninsular would be interesting. Some of the Divisional commanders might be good, in fact more so than their seniors.

Bragg appeals. Yes honestly, I mean you couldn't get bored around HQ could you. The infighting, the tantrums, the tense conferences, the insubordination.

Or on the same theme how about Hood out West. That would be pretty mind boggling too!

Come on then men! Lets hear it! Whose your Boss?

As you can see I've already broken the rule and gone to Army command so if Grant, Lee etc is you choice, fine, just tell us why!

Mooseworks806 May 2017 7:53 a.m. PST

Union: McClellan,Blunt, Herron
Confederates: Lee, Cleburne, Hindman

BW195906 May 2017 8:14 a.m. PST

Union: Thomas, Rosecrans, & Hooker (for a good time)

Reb: Cleburne

amoryms06 May 2017 8:16 a.m. PST

Union: Grant from Fort Donelson, Shiloh, to Vicksburg

CSA: Joe Johnston during the Atlanta Campaign

coopman06 May 2017 9:06 a.m. PST

Bragg. So that he might suffer an "unfortunate" accident and become a casualty of war.

Desert Fox06 May 2017 9:19 a.m. PST

Stuart--dashing, daring, and colorful! Last of the true cavalier-types. Not to mention surrounded by some of the most interesting figures in the Army of Northern Virginia.

wrgmr106 May 2017 9:32 a.m. PST

Thomas Union
Stuart Confederate

donlowry06 May 2017 10:17 a.m. PST

Someone stationed well to the rear, say in Washington, St. Louis or Cincinnati.

Shagnasty Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2017 10:56 a.m. PST

Another vote for Stuart, except for the saddle sores.

John Miller06 May 2017 11:43 a.m. PST

For the USA: Kearny, Richardson, Hays, Custer, & Hancock. For the CSA: JEB Stuart & Lee John Miller

Frothers Did It And Ran Away06 May 2017 11:45 a.m. PST

I'm going to go for Sherman and Forrest, both for their ferocity. Never a dull moment, I'm sure.

advocate Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2017 12:45 p.m. PST

The Union Commander in Chief. So I could tell him that that play was no good.

Trajanus06 May 2017 1:43 p.m. PST

Don,

Sounds like Montgomery Meigs is your man!

How's your eye for detail?

Stephen Miller06 May 2017 2:14 p.m. PST

Hooker, because I know how good his plan at Chancellorsville was, and maybe I could buck up his courage at the crucial moment and get him to keep moving his troops east till they were clear of the Wilderness.

Sobieski06 May 2017 4:54 p.m. PST

That of someone who knew how to spell "whose".

Bill N06 May 2017 5:12 p.m. PST

Serving on someone's staff wouldn't just be a chance to observe or influence history. It would be a job. I would prefer to serve on the staff of someone I could work with. Unfortunately much of what is written about ACW staff service seems to come from sycophants so we don't get an objective picture. My preference would probably be McClellan at the army level and Longstreet below that.

Cleburne186306 May 2017 5:19 p.m. PST

Alpheus Williams. First Winchester, Cedar Mountain, Antietam, Chancellorsville, Gettysburg, Resaca, New Hope Church, Kolb Farm, Peachtree Creek, March to the Sea, Carolina Campaign. They saw it all.

John Miller06 May 2017 6:57 p.m. PST

Trajanus: "just tell us why" The five Union Generals are favorites of mine due to their common practice of leading from the front. Before the war ended it cost three of them their lives and one of them a pretty severe wound. I admire leaders who are not averse to sharing the dangers they expect their subordinates to endure. Not only that, they appear, through the distance of the many years, to be "mans' men". Stuart because I picture him as one of the "romantic warriors", a George Patton kind of guy. Robert E. Lee because I think of him as the ultimate professional soldier, what a West Point man should be, politics notwithstanding. I won't have access to a computer for a few days so if anyone cares to comment on my trivial ramblings please don't be offended if I don't get back to you right away. John Miller

ZULUPAUL Supporting Member of TMP06 May 2017 9:46 p.m. PST

Custer, Sherman, Sheridan.

Old Pete07 May 2017 2:05 a.m. PST

General Longstreet the best Corps Commander in the war.

Trajanus07 May 2017 3:28 a.m. PST

That of someone who knew how to spell "whose".

Oh I know how to spell it. Not the same as remembering to use it in the proper context, instead of "Who's" though is it?

donlowry07 May 2017 9:46 a.m. PST

Meigs? No, I had enough paper-shuffling in the USAF. Maybe Grant -- he wrote his own orders and dispatches, so I wouldn't have had to. And for much of the war he had a handy river boat for his headquarter.

Nottingham Wargames07 May 2017 10:51 a.m. PST

Would have loved to have followed Nathan Bedford Forrest on his activities in Tennessee and Kentuky. That would have been very exciting. Fighting with Joe Wheeler would also have been interesting.

Ottoathome07 May 2017 12:41 p.m. PST

McClellan's. I once told a re-enactor friend of mine that I wasn't much interested in re-enacting the battles. But when they made a re-enactment unit of the General Staff for the Army of the Potomac I'm all for the champagne and oyster picnics with the faire femmes (north or south)on the Potomac

Old Contemptibles08 May 2017 7:22 a.m. PST

Cleburne, Hancock

donlowry08 May 2017 9:45 a.m. PST

Fighting with Joe Wheeler would also have been interesting.

And you could plunder everyone, Union and secessionists alike!

Personal logo Tacitus Supporting Member of TMP09 May 2017 12:59 p.m. PST

Point for Sobieski.

TKindred Supporting Member of TMP10 May 2017 1:04 p.m. PST

Federal Army: Sedgewick or Sickles when they were Corps Commanders.

Confederate: Hood or Mahone as brigade commanders.

bgbboogie13 May 2017 11:54 a.m. PST

CSA – Bragg to see if he was as bad as some make out.
USA – Sickles

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.