"Chasseurs des montagnes" Topic
9 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please remember not to make new product announcements on the forum. Our advertisers pay for the privilege of making such announcements.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the Empire Message Board Back to the Napoleonic Discussion Message Board
Areas of InterestNapoleonic
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article
Featured Workbench Article
Featured Profile Article Part II of the Gates of Old Jerusalem.
Current Poll
|
Please sign in to your membership account, or, if you are not yet a member, please sign up for your free membership account.
| Nine pound round | 23 Apr 2017 5:26 p.m. PST |
Does anyone have an opinion on these fellows: link If you had to rate them using Empire classes, what would they be? I have some spare revolutionary era grunts that I am going to paint up, largely because they're going to be easy to quickly paint and mount: 90% of this can be handled with a brown spray. Should fit in for a Peninsular battle. I was inclined to consider them just regular line or conscript, but perhaps they deserve better? |
| 21eRegt | 23 Apr 2017 6:10 p.m. PST |
That's a tough one. Although they were probably good at what they did, they shouldn't be able to stand in a line and shoot it out with regulars. So I'd probably call them Conscript/Conscript (or veteran) with a very good skirmish rating. |
| Edwulf | 23 Apr 2017 6:23 p.m. PST |
They were a bit sub standard compared to the regular line units. Big trouble with desertion. |
| Nine pound round | 23 Apr 2017 6:41 p.m. PST |
I'm leaning toward Regular, with a Good unformed rating (using Revolution &Empire ratings). Regular was "bottom of the barrel" rating for legere in Spain 08-12. That "Good" is better than typical, but it would reflect experience scouring hillsides. |
| 21eRegt | 24 Apr 2017 7:55 a.m. PST |
I know about the desertion problem, but figured the tabletop representation would be the best since they hung around. But it is hard to develop some cohesiveness or skill with a big turnover, so the Conscript rating. |
 Bobgnar  | 24 Apr 2017 10:23 a.m. PST |
Fred VIetmeyer classified them as militia light infantry for column line and square. I have two battalions of them organize that way. |
| attilathepun47 | 24 Apr 2017 10:29 a.m. PST |
As I understand it, the Chasseurs de Montagne were never intended to face regular soldiers in battle. To put it in modern terms, they were more of a paramilitary force for combating guerillas, bandits, and smugglers. If you insist on putting them in the line of battle, then I would second Bobgnar's classification. |
| Nine pound round | 24 Apr 2017 6:02 p.m. PST |
Yup,mall true- Gendarmarie weren't,neither, but sometimes they did. Thanks for all the suggestions, they will be very helpful. |
| Khusrau | 25 Apr 2017 7:27 a.m. PST |
Funnily enough, I acquired some revolutionary French figures in bicorne, and decided to do exactly the same thing. Not yet painted but I was going to use them as basically poor quality regulars. |
|
paints the Dogman from the Flintloque starter set.
