Help support TMP

"PSC and Old Glory 15mm Universal Carriers compared" Topic

4 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.

Back to the WWII Models Review Message Board

Back to the Blogs of War Message Board

Back to the Wargaming in the United Kingdom Message Board

1,229 hits since 16 Apr 2017
©1994-2018 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

acatcalledelvis16 Apr 2017 6:07 a.m. PST

On TMP the other day someone asked whether PSC and Battlefront are compatible. Well my opinion is they could be, and I certainly mix the two in my units (but I am not so worried about such things)
As it happens I have just got (along with the Battlegroup Tobruk book) the new PSC 15mm Universal Carrier box. I say box,……

Read more


Tgunner16 Apr 2017 8:57 a.m. PST

That's been my experience with PSC. Their vehicles are just a bit smaller than everyone else's stuff. However it's close enough for gaming. At least to me. YMMV.

Winston Smith Supporting Member of TMP16 Apr 2017 9:19 a.m. PST


freerangeegg17 Apr 2017 1:16 a.m. PST

The Old Glory/Skytrex/Command decision Carriers are one of their worst sculpts, and are over size compared to everyone elses.
I have Battlefront, Qualitycast and skytrex no PSC yet, I will dig some of them out and post a comparison picture later today.
I would expect PSC will match the others size wise

freerangeegg17 Apr 2017 2:23 a.m. PST

From left to right these are Old Glory/ Skytrex universal carrier, Battlefront/Flamesof War universal carrier, Qualitycast universal and Quality cast Scout carrier, as you can see the Old glory one is definitely bigger, whereas the others all match quite nicely size wise.I would expect the PSC one would too.

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.