"Order of Tandem Limber Horses" Topic
6 Posts
All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.
Please use the Complaint button (!) to report problems on the forums.
For more information, see the TMP FAQ.
Back to the American Revolution Message Board
Areas of Interest18th Century
Featured Hobby News Article
Featured Link
Top-Rated Ruleset
Featured Showcase Article The Acolyte Vampires return - based, now, and ready for the game table.
Featured Profile Article The Editor takes a tour of resin scenics manufacturer Wargame Ruins, and in the process gets some painting tips...
Featured Book Review
|
 ColCampbell  | 04 Apr 2017 1:30 p.m. PST |
I'm almost finished painting the Fife & Drum AE-005 limber set. But I'm not sure in what order the horses should be – ridden horse in front or in back close to limber? See link for pictures. Thanks, Jim |
| JimDuncanUK | 04 Apr 2017 2:08 p.m. PST |
Ridden horse first surely. |
| Vespasian28 | 04 Apr 2017 2:29 p.m. PST |
Absolutely otherwise no control. Not a terribly good example but the Kings Troop RHA don't leave that first pair unridden. |
| ColCampbell | 05 Apr 2017 7:24 a.m. PST |
Question has been answered by a posting on my blog by Steve the Wargamer. He posted a picture from DAF's Fife & Drum blog showing the unridden horse between the limber poles and the ridden horse in front of that one. Thanks, Steve. Jim |
| historygamer | 05 Apr 2017 9:40 a.m. PST |
I'm not sure what period this is addressing, but if 18th century, I am not even sure they had a rider. The Warley Camp series doesn't show any riders on the limber teams for artillery. One shows a mounted driver while the other has them on foot walking along side. |
| 42flanker | 05 Apr 2017 4:17 p.m. PST |
The 3-pdr rigged up to be harnessed as a 'galloper', shown in a Congreve sketch c.1780, – as shown in the Fife and Drum blog was clearly intended for travelling in column of march, rather than in action, and may only have been a speculative design rather than reflecting campaign practice. |
|
