"A Counterfactual Study of the Charge of the Light Brigade" Topic

link
A Counterfactual Study of the Charge of the Light Brigade
David Connors, Michael J. Armstrong & John Bonnett
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History Vol. 48 , Iss. 2,2015

Researchers use a mathematical model to perform a counterfactual study of the 1854 Charge of the Light Brigade. They first calibrate the model with historical data so that it reproduces the actual charge's outcome. They then adjust the model to see how that outcome might have changed if the Heavy Brigade had joined the charge and/or if the charge had targeted the Russian forces on the heights instead of those in the valley. The results suggest that all the counterfactual attacks would have led to heavier British casualties. However, a charge by both brigades along the valley might plausibly have yielded a British victory.

I came across this paper at work today, and I thought I'd share it.
Cheers,
Martin

Is there any version of the facts that doesn't result in massive loss of life for the British?

Remember though, the Heavy brigade had fought off a massive Russian cavalry force a few hours earlier, and were not at full combat efficiency.
I wonder if an Light Brigade had charged the Russians on the Causeway heights would have worked if brigaded with the Chasseurs d'Afrique?

Having read the article, it doesn't seem like rocket-science – or something that couldn't have been thought through using a board or figure game.
- reinforcing the charge might have given them a chance of success against the cavalry at the end of the valley;
- charging uphill against combined arms would likely have been even less successful.
And like the games, the analysis of what might-have-happened benefits enormously from hindsight and the all-knowing general.

Neat stuff, Martin!

Considering everything, the British casualties were kinda light, IMO. The Heavy Brigade may have caused a general Russian route, I'd think?