Help support TMP


"Why you cannot make Star Trek Models all to the same..." Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the Star Trek Message Board


Action Log

08 Jun 2017 1:02 p.m. PST
by Editor in Chief Bill

  • Removed from SF Discussion board
  • Crossposted to Star Trek board


820 hits since 23 Mar 2017
©1994-2017 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP23 Mar 2017 8:57 p.m. PST

…Scale.

WE'RE HUGE FANS OF CONSTANT SCALE MODELLING. It's the only way to be able to accurately compare different subjects…"

See here
link


Amicalement
Armand

Personal logo Coyotepunc and Hatshepsuut Supporting Member of TMP23 Mar 2017 9:47 p.m. PST

I didn't read the article. But I will say that when I started making the patterns for a 1/4000 papercraft Narada to go with the rest of my Star Trek stuff, it turned out to be over five feet long.

To get the vertical spine onto one sheet of cardstock, I had to reduce it to 1/38,000 scale.

And that is why we can't have Star Trek models all in the same scale.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP23 Mar 2017 10:07 p.m. PST

Don't miss the trailer my friend… (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Allen5724 Mar 2017 7:55 a.m. PST

Starship sizes as offered by the various storylines are absurd. Suspension of disbelief is insufficient to allow me to accept ships so large. I once read a story where planets might have 1 or 2 starships because the cost of building and maintaining them was just too much for the planetary economy. The ships of the Star Trek and Star Wars universes are completely out of hand and could not be supported.

Garand24 Mar 2017 7:58 a.m. PST

The problem with Trek (and a lot of franchises, frankly) is the bigger, the better, the more the stakes. You couldn't have the Ent E being smaller than the D…it had to be BIGGER. So Trek has had (since nextgen) a real size bloat in its ships, with some exceptions. When I model Trek I ONLY do TOS/Movie ships in 1/1000, and if ever I do NextGen it will probably be in 1/2500 scale (I have an Ent D in my stash unbuilt at this scale). Now if only a lot of the classic Trek models were actually done at constant scale…

Damon.

Allen5724 Mar 2017 8:35 a.m. PST

IIRC some time back in the 70s the real world US Navy reclassified its ships. This was in part due to changes in weapon suites but also due to the changing size of ships. Due to tech changes the Enterprise E could be smaller than the D but that is no fun. We have not reached the point where there are starships the size of planets yet except perhaps for the original death star and whatever they call the huge death ray in the newest Star Wars movie. I did read another SF story in which it was discovered that our moon was in fact a giant starship. Starships are not the only place you sometimes see absurdly large vehicles. Ogre and the Berserkers spring to mind as does Bun Bun the tank in the Posleen line of stories.

goragrad24 Mar 2017 10:44 a.m. PST

Interesting.

Tango01 Supporting Member of TMP24 Mar 2017 10:52 a.m. PST

Glad you enjoyed it my friend!. (smile)


Amicalement
Armand

Dynaman878924 Mar 2017 11:21 a.m. PST

How DARE you insult Bun Bun by referring to it as a mere "tank".

Allen5724 Mar 2017 12:17 p.m. PST

Dynaman, Wanna see my Bun Bun? Seriously I made a reduced size version using one of the moving city modules from the Command Horizon line (BTW their centaur figures would make great 6mm Posleen). The actual vehicle in scale with 6mm/1:300 scale models would be 7 inches high by 15 inches long by 15.5 inches wide. A bit large for most gaming.

badger2224 Mar 2017 5:49 p.m. PST

Good Rabbit

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.