Help support TMP


"OTR - change formation then charge." Topic


11 Posts

All members in good standing are free to post here. Opinions expressed here are solely those of the posters, and have not been cleared with nor are they endorsed by The Miniatures Page.

Please don't call someone a Nazi unless they really are a Nazi.

For more information, see the TMP FAQ.


Back to the ACW Discussion Message Board


Areas of Interest

American Civil War

Featured Hobby News Article


Featured Link


Featured Ruleset


Featured Showcase Article

Project Completion: 1:72 Scale ACW Union Army

Personal logo Editor in Chief Bill The Editor of TMP Fezian feels it's important to celebrate progress in one's personal hobby life.


Featured Workbench Article

Building the Thoroughbred USS Monitor

The G Dog Fezian couldn't say 'no' to this opportunity!


Featured Profile Article

Coker House Restored

Personal logo reeves lk Supporting Member of TMP updates us on progress at this Champion Hill landmark.


736 hits since 8 Mar 2017
©1994-2024 Bill Armintrout
Comments or corrections?

sillypoint08 Mar 2017 6:15 a.m. PST

OTR – Koch updated by Mark Severin.
A unit in line is 2 inches from the enemy, it changes formation to attack column, can the unit charge – test to roll under its cv?
Can a unit form reinforced line and charge?
A very simple set of rules, and the longest one our group has played, yet it continually throws up new concepts, especially when someone reads the rules. 😜

Ed Mohrmann Supporting Member of TMP08 Mar 2017 6:37 a.m. PST

Why would you form reinforced line (essentially a
defensive gambit) and charge ?

As to all that, I played OTR for a long time (and
used to give it away here until Mark bought the rights)
and I never allowed a unit to change formation and
then charge.

Remember, those are BRIGADES and I've always felt that
changing formation for a unit of that size and then
charging would be difficult in the time-frame
represented in the rules.

ACWBill08 Mar 2017 7:23 a.m. PST

I agree with Ed on this matter. To reform a brigade is not a matter of a few moments. Such a change would take 15 minutes or even longer depending on th experience level of the unit in question. Charging after that while under fire, doubtful.

Personal logo ColCampbell Supporting Member of TMP08 Mar 2017 9:35 a.m. PST

And most "charges" in the ACW made by brigades were in line or reinforced line formation. I'm with Ed and Bill on this, you are trying a "gamey" tactic that would not have been used on the field of battle.

Jim

vtsaogames08 Mar 2017 9:58 a.m. PST

Talk to the Napoleonic French about changing formation under fire. Maybe if you pass two tests, a single fail makes you disorganized.

ACWBill08 Mar 2017 10:31 a.m. PST

I would love to talk to the Napoleonic French, alas, even if I could find a true medium, I haven't the language skills to chat about their drill. I have no doubt that they may have been able to do so, but 1863 Volunteers from Minnesota were not so well drilled.

advocate08 Mar 2017 11:38 a.m. PST

Not sure where to start. Certainly Napoleonic doctrine would be to form line to engage the enemy, not change from line to column.
As stated above, it would take time. What are the enemy doing while you carry out a parade-ground manoeuvre directly to his front?
Even if allowed by the rules, don't do it.
Play the period, not the rules.

Who asked this joker08 Mar 2017 11:44 a.m. PST

Ed Mohrman said it. Seems unnatural to allow a unit to change formation and charge that close to an enemy.

Who asked this joker08 Mar 2017 11:49 a.m. PST

I would love to talk to the Napoleonic French, alas, even if I could find a true medium, I haven't the language skills to chat about their drill.

The French intended to move in column rapidly toward the enemy and deploy in line at about 100 yards…the range the musket starts to become a little bit deadly.

The tactic failed in battles where reverse slope tactics were employed because the enemy could not be seen until the crest was crossed, by that time, the column was only about 30 yards from the enemy…very deadly range. Changing formation under galling fire proved impossible.

ACWBill08 Mar 2017 12:12 p.m. PST

Remember also, smoothbore muskets were out of general use by mid 1862 and rifles would be deadly at a much greater range. Again, such a tactic would be unlikely and probably suicidal. I think I recall some CS units stopping to dress their lines at Malvern Hill, and it was viewed as an extraordinary event by witnesses.

sillypoint08 Mar 2017 1:23 p.m. PST

Ok, thanks.
😁

Sorry - only verified members can post on the forums.